Talk:Article Five of the United States Constitution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I see no reason why Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution should not be merged with this page. The two pages simply appear to be saying the same thing twice in different pages, and it would be easier and more logical if they were combined into one page. - Terraxos, 23:33
Better to eliminate the excess from Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution than add so much information that has little relevence to Article Five. The failed attempts are discinct enough to warrant their own space. --N Prado
I agree with N Prado-- eliminate the amendment procedure stuff from Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution and vice-versa, but leave as two separate articles. QuixoticKate 05:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Disagree on merge. Keep Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution as its own entry. The amendment procedure stuff should be abbreviated or eliminated. There should be more info about the six proposed amendments that passed congress but failed with the states. There should be info about at least some of the bills proposed by congress that failed to pass. There could also be info about grassroots pushes for amendments that were unsuccessful in even getting a member of congress to propose them, if notable enough. Schizombie 01:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
