From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
??? |
This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
Please rate this article and leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
"Lapham" appears without additional identification in the Stockade section and is quoted there. His full name is not given until the succeeding section.
- The "(v.i.)" after his name stands for the Latin "vide infra", and is a standard abbreviation for "see below". Q.E.D., and all that. -- John Owens 18:05, 2003 Sep 13 (UTC)
[edit] Request for references
Hi, I am working to encourage implementation of the goals of the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy. Part of that is to make sure articles cite their sources. This is particularly important for featured articles, since they are a prominent part of Wikipedia. Further reading is not the same thing as proper references. Further reading could list works about the topic that were not ever consulted by the page authors. If some of the works listed in the further reading section were used to add or check material in the article, please list them in a references section instead. The Fact and Reference Check Project has more information. Thank you, and please leave me a message when you have added a few references to the article. - Taxman 19:33, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm stating the obvious here, but this is the best Wis. State Park article. I hope to see some of the others along the same lines. Good work.--Hraefen 20:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm making a request for removing it from FA status right now, needs some help this article. Thanks --Jaranda wat's sup 18:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC)