User talk:M4URIZ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Admins: This is not a second or another user name other than user name assumed for 160.79.139.10 upon suggestion by a user BertilVidet on October18, 2006 to prevent future confusion (the reference link supporting this is immediately below). This is not a sockpuppet activity either. Both this user and its IP address have been mistakenly blocked upon my critisim of 3RR violation by the same person. I don't know how Daniel.Bryant is coming up with his assertion that this is a second user name which is incorrect. Please see REF: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A160.79.139.10&diff=82240462&oldid=82239681 Talk page of independent user 160.79.139.10 (This reference above shows the conversation from October 18,2006 as follows:

-Listen, your continously insults will not bring you anywhere. May I suggest you finding a more constructive approach? Bertilvidet 16:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC) -I am sorry, I was only trying to establish consensus by reposting there, no insult was meant. I dont endorse the vandalism claims or anything mentioned there. You are more than welcome to change everything if you want. Take care. (by 160.79.139.10) -The relevant pages have been subject to a lot of vandalism and personal attacks. So I might have reacted to fast by believing you were the same person. I do apologize sincerely if I am wrong. May I suggest you to sign up, and get a user name at Wikipedia. Bertilvidet 17:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I had posted the same in appeal of the block to be reversed by deleted out by BertilVidet which should not have been not to violate the wikipedia rules.

I request lift of block on both this user and its IP address. Thanks very much for your time.

Admins: WP:RFCU#Khoikhoi.27s fan, second username. Daniel.Bryant ^{[[ T · C ]} 21:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Not true at all. Independent contributor M4URIZ

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: "160.79.139.10 IP address and this user has nothing to do with any blocked user or suckpuppetting. What is this all about? I endorsed and reposted some changes which was continued to be reverted in violation of 3RR role with a sham suckpuppet story! Similar mistake was made before by the same parties. A user name was obtained as suggested by the involved parties. Please see below references. Admin. is requested to also address to the 3RR violators at Ataturk page as well as unblocking these and helping revert the changes at Ataturk page. Many thanks."

Decline reason: "As your first edit to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is identical to this one by 172GAL (talk • contribs) I am inclined to accept Khoikhoi's assessment that you are indeed a sockpuppet of 172GAL. If you want to resume editing Wikipedia, I suggest you stop violating Wikipedia:Sock puppetry immediately and appeal your original account's block. My decision is not an endorsement of any side in this current editing dispute. -- Netsnipe ► 15:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/4/u/User_talk%7EM4URIZ_16be.html"

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

User talk:M4URIZ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Views

Navigation

Search