User talk:NoSeptember

[edit] Barnstar

For the NoSeptember admin project, an exceptional user-initiated research endeavour. Well done. -- Samir धर्म 10:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Must say, your admin project is stellar. I view it as the only viable user-initiated research done here. We need more compilations like this in order to improve systemically. The data is all there for assessment, just need people with intiative to assess it! Kudos -- Samir धर्म 10:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Thanks

Thanks NoSept. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 20:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Wikipedia:Sensitive IP addresses

I'm afraid I can't answer that you will have to ask the committee. At a guess I'd say the members talk pages would be the next aproach but I really don't know.Geni 13:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here

[edit] Arbitration Clerks

Related talk: here

[edit] Questions?

Hello NoSeptember, I saw the questions on Tony's talk page and wonder if you have worries about arb clerking that I need to address.

Background about my clerking: Knowing that Tony is clerking most cases alone, while he was on his break I started helping a little by reminding arbitrators of skipped votes on cases ready to close. I was reluctant to do more without the official okay of the Arb comm. That was my personal preference and I have no problem with other people doing helpful tasks on the arbitration pages. The arb comm can best speak to exactly what is helpful and what is not.

If you have questions about my clerking please ask me. I'm very open to community feedback, especially from thoughtful users like you. ;-) Take care, FloNight 13:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

You said, "I'm glad that you have volunteered. Good luck :)."

Thanks ;-) Going to be interesting! Take care, FloNight 16:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Re: ED

I don't understand… —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-¢|ε|Ŀ|T|♪-) 20:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here

[edit] Sorry

You removed a link I had to User:Phaedriel's talk page which disclosed a very unflattering webpage about her. I was not trying to commit an act of vandalism, however, I feel this user has the right to know about degrading content being posted about her on the world wide web. I understand your intentions, however, I believe you sincerely are overlooking a critical problem concerning her. NOVO-REI 02:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

She already knows all about it, trust me. There are better ways of telling her than posting it on her talk page anyway. ++Lar: t/c 18:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Admin Project

I just saw you editing all the pages of the admin project adding the stuff I was supposed to do and I want to say I am sorry I forgot. I was going to do it and I guess I got caught up with something else. If there are any more pages needing me to add the <div id="contentSub"> then i'll be glad to do it. GeorgeMoney (talk) 03:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

You don't have to do that. Just showing me how to do it was enough. It was on my list of things to do, and I finally got around to it. I learn all the formating tricks here at WP by copying what others have done :). NoSeptember 10:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 1000 admins

Yes, I have. I've notified the newsroom, and they'll decide if they want to run a full story on it, but I'm definitely going to have a mention in the F&A section of the Signpost. Thanks for the tip! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 01:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I'll put a link up momentarily... thanks again for all of your help. I think your help could merit a mention as a co-writer! What do you think? Just a thought. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 03:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Eh, I just wanted some more content, so I thought I'd just add some other junk... do you feel that the article has enough material? If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 02:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I was thinking something along the lines of other projects' admin count, but I had trouble finding an easy way to do so. Do you have any ideas on how to do so? If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 02:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again for all of your help. How does the article look now? 03:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Giano

Kindly do not leave pompous, officious, and threatening messages on my talk page. Thank you Giano | talk 16:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Leaving messages to discourage incivility towards other users is an accepted practice at Wikipedia, you are free to consider them pompous or officious if you want to. NoSeptember 17:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

It is not accepted by me, so you are in error. I do consider you to be both presumptious and threatening, and have repleid to that effect on my own page. Giano | talk 17:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

So, it is accepted practice at Wikipedia, but not accepted by you personally. I hope that this disparity does not lead to problems for you in the future. Cheers, NoSeptember 17:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here and here

[edit] Are you accusing me of "staging" something?

I hope I'm misreading you, but this remark made me blink in disbelief. It sounds exactly like you're accusing me of some deception or collusion — I assume collusion with Giano — some type of dishonest practice, "for an audience". Are you? Please be as specific and explicit as possible on this head, I'm really interested. Bishonen | talk 20:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC).

Of course not and nothing in the post even hinted at deception or collusion or dishonesty. Where did you come up with such an idea? The most I said about you was that you misunderstood my original post there. Please do not try to interpret complicated layers of hidden meaning into my posts, I tend to post quite literal thoughts and am not trying to create hidden messages. When I say for example, "there is nothing wrong with encouraging users to keep their posts civil", I mean just that without any sort of hidden meaning. And I hope you agree with that simple statement, and I encourage you to leave encouragements to remain civil here whenever you feel it is needed (I promise I won't try to find any sort of hidden meaning in it if you do). NoSeptember 22:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Where did I come up with... right. Well, I assumed I was part of "some users" and "at least two users". Now you tell me you intended no connection between the sentences these appeared in, and the following sentences about "staged wikidrama" and an "audience". Even though they were all part of the same single short paragraph. I'm glad to hear it. If you were a student of mine, I would "encourage" you to try for a greater degree of control of textual implication. But I won't be so patronizing. Bishonen | talk 23:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC).

Yes, it was a separate thought, I don't make posts with a bunch of short paragraphs usually. <<Special Bishonen complete change of thought notification :)>> I agree with your RfA statement that blocks can have consequences, particularly in how blocked users react. I think the same is true of users who have to deal with ongoing incivility, it can affect their attitude about wikipedia and even whether they will continue at the project. How people react to incivility should be taken as seriously as how they react to blocking, and it's the friends of a user who should be the first to encourage that user to remain civil at all times. NoSeptember 00:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Quick favor

I'm writing for the Wikipedia Signpost about the 1000th admin, and I was wondering if I could somehow get the date of when English Wikipedia passed 1,000 administrators total (including the desysopped). If this is too much trouble, don't worry and don't feel obligated to do so. Also, is there anything that you'd like to see in the article? I'm fully open to ideas. You can follow the work in progress at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-09-05/1000 Administrators. Thanks for your help! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 02:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for all your suggestions, and I'll see what I can conjure up tonight. Thanks again for all of your help! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 19:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] ED

I saw you've been removing links to encyclopedia dramatica and want to inform you that they even have an interwiki prefix for it at m:Interwiki map. Do you think the interwiki should be removed? I think it should be removed. And it is also breaking the rules about the interwikis. "Remember to specify why the prefix would be useful on a significant number of pages on Wikimedia Foundation projects". How is ED helpful? GeorgeMoney (talk) 03:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

You have a good point. A request to remove it would have to be made here, and I have no idea of what standards they would apply to such a request, but it would be worth bringing the issue to their attention. NoSeptember 03:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

The reason I found out about the interwiki was Freakofnurture blocked 74.104.100.26 with the block summary of just a link to the ED page on nathan using the interwiki, which I find highly inappropriate. GeorgeMoney (talk) 17:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for your congratulations :) —Xyrael / 12:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. You practically set a record sending out those thank you notes :) NoSeptember 12:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here

[edit] Chip in?

Hi. Since you were the first to bring up this situation, I thought that you might want to say something in this thread I started due to Essjay's recent inactivity (regarding WP:RCU). Cheers, Redux 19:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I waited a few days to let others reply, but few have anything to say :). NoSeptember 10:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] crazy globes

NoSeptember, YOU ROCK! your moving globe things on your user page are very cool! i want one on my user page. can you tell what i need to do? the springy one is the best! please? Touth 22:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Click on any image and it takes you to the image page. Just add the image like any link (ie. [[image:Coil spring animation.gif|100px]], with the px controlling the sizing). NoSeptember 01:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] San Francisco, California article

Hi, another editor and I have put in some mega-hours over the last two weeks trying to knock the SF article into shape for a Feature Article nomination. Would you mind looking at it? Also, the current editors are a bit cross-eyed and could use some recommendations for other Wikisouls who might be willing to proofread or copyedit the article. Thanks for any help! --Paul 01:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, perhaps tomorrow. I would think those who did other geographic FAs would be good people to ask too. NoSeptember 01:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to look at the article. Your comments are appreciated. --Paul 15:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. NoSeptember 15:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

We have re-submitted the article as a FAC. We shall see what other editors think of the effort. Thanks again for taking the time to have a look.--Paul 05:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

When I was resubmitting the article as a FAC, I inadvertently created Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/San Francisco, California/archive2. Can you get it deleted? Thank you! --Paul 20:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Another delete request: 14:10, 12 September 2006 Paul.h (Talk | contribs) uploaded "Image:Treasure island aerial.jpg" (The 1939 Golden Gate International Exposition on Treasure Island. Postcard image #6 of 15 by Moulin. Published in 1939, copyright not renewed - image is in the public domain.)

Turns out the copyright WAS renewed & the image is currently protected.--Paul 23:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

I have deleted it. NoSeptember 23:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here

[edit] Clearly understood

Sorry for the posts on the encyclopedic rival of Wikipedia which from now on will go unnamed from my part. I was only trying to inform Phaedriel of what was going on for her benefit. Also, I would like to know your opinion on the case of the former Wikipedian Encyclopedist. Has this type of thing happened before? Is he now a "major" vandal - given the amount and the sheer (mostly positive) history of the user? NOVO-REI 02:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Only by returning to constant productive article editing will he return to the good graces of the community, forgeting all thoughts of RfA, forgeting all disputations with other users and past controversies, and so on. And he doesn't need the Encyclopedist username to do productive editing (I'm sure he is already editing by IP anyway, perhaps not a lot though). I don't think there is such a thing as a major vandal, all vandals are more and more just being considered as bothersome, and should be and are starting to be ignored. What happened months ago is no longer significant, Wikipedia has moved on. NoSeptember 15:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] NOVO-REI = Encyclopedist?

I have a suspicion that NOVO-REI and Encyclopedist might be the same person or at least connected in some way. Here's my evidence: NR's user page looks similar in style and design to Encyclopedist's former user page; both E and NR are college students in Florida; both list English as their native language and have a decent command of Spanish and Portuguese, with some command of French and Interlingua; and both show an interest in history. What do you think? Scobell302 06:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I had considered the possibility, and wrote the reply above assuming Encyclopedist would read it sooner or later. But I don't really care about role accounts unless and until they start acting badly. Wikipedia can not truly ban anyone from posting, and as long as they are posting constructively, we have no need to worry about socks. Btw, whose role account are you? ;) NoSeptember 12:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] thank you

Hello there, thank you for your kind praise. I do still feel badly about it. As Gmaxwell rightly points out on his user page, not assuming good faith can potentially scare away well-meaning editors of any experience level. I tried to be sufficiently clear in my initial message as to why I objected to the image, without being unduly harsh. Looking back at my choice of words, the message seems at least polite, if perhaps a bit cold. I think I could have handled that a little better.

In any case, thanks for your feedback and for your praise! --Tachikoma 03:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here

[edit] User talk:NoSeptember from 9/7 to 9/9/06

User:NoSeptember/wikibreak was transcluded here
hidden messages:

[edit] Glad to be back.

Thanks for the warm welcome.  :) Figured it was better to edit in the open than via my work and home IPs, especially in light of the fact I'm editing on other Wikia projects. Might as well come back to the big kahuna of the bunch. Funny you should send me those links. I just heard from Jimbo who ran my request to be reinstated as an admin by the ArbCom. I'm pleased to make you the first to know that my request has been approved and I shall be donning mop and bucket once again. I just need a bureaucrat to throw the switch. Shot an e-mail to Jimbo less than an hour ago, in fact. - Lucky 6.9 23:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Ain't it the truth? I was amazed as to how quickly Jimbo got back to me. Nice to feel wanted, I can tell you. Looks like I'm still waiting for the push of the magic button; no matter. There's a lot that can keep me busy around here until then. Vandals, beware! The guy in the big bad blue Benz (or a Hyundai Accent most of the time) is back! - Lucky 6.9 01:16, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your many contributions to Wikipedia, I award you, NoSeptember, the Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Michael 20:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. Michael 00:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Freestylefrappe, Ya ya Ya etc

As you unblocked Ya ya ya ya ya is this now the primary account of this user? Is the arbitration ruling restricting him to one account still in place? Also I don't understand the current user page contents [[1]] which don't seem to relate to fsp or ya ya. In any case it is very different to [[2]]82.41.98.219 12:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Ya ya ya ya ya ya is the account he selected per Dmcdevit's talk page. As long as he doesn't violate any policies he can set up his pages as he likes, redirecting the alternate accounts to the Ya ya account. Sockpuppet tags are not needed, all accounts other than Ya ya are indef blocked. NoSeptember 15:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Admin graphs

If it's not too much trouble, can you do an admin graph of admin growth over featured article percentage? Featured article statistics can be found here. You have the admin statistics, of course. Thanks in advance. -- Миборовский 03:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I see. Thanks anyway. I'll let you know if I do make a graph. -- Миборовский 06:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] School block

Thankyou NoSeptember. I will get the IP Address for you by Friday.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Auroranorth (talk • contribs) .
Nonsense
Sorry if it's nonsense about Willy on Wheels... I just thought it should be a warning... OK. Sorry! Auroranorth 08:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here, here and here

[edit] Unblock

Thx. Ya, I keep meaning to contact somebody or some page to find out the status of the proxy. But then I'm unblocked and have better things to do. Marskell 10:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] For you help

		The Minor Barnstar
		For your help in the redesign of the EA Page I award you this minor star Æon Insanity Now!EA! 04:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Re : WikiBreak

Oh well, I guess I can't get the addiction off me just yet, I hope I actually am able to later on...! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 20:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Wiki at a crawl past few hours

Hey there NoSept. That was a good one on Thatcher's rfa. Common' now - NH politics are very important... LOL. Very good, I needed that. I was going to submit an article, but Wiki has been at a crawl last two hours? I think I'll submit Tomorrow. Later - Again, good one! JungleCat talk/contrib 21:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] User:NoSeptember/Desysop edit

Re: [3]. Whoops! Sorry about that! --Durin 21:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for doing the updating :). NoSeptember 21:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Excuse Me

I'm curious about what you were talking about in RFA about me. Do you live in New Hampshire as well? I'm from Manchester here. People Powered 00:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy

Hi. You contributed to the discussion at Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy. If you have the time and interest, I'm asking contributors to past a brief summary of their position on the proposal here, thanks. Herostratus 20:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Categories for judges

Thanks for your message on my talk page. I do intend to create the subcategory that you suggest, although I don't know much about the technical details of creating categories and templates, so it will have to wait a few days until I can find the appropriate help page and read up on such things. Having also had some of my basic judge biography articles rightly tagged with the "unsourced" template, I also anticipate creating a template indicating that some information has been derived from the Federal Judicial Center's biographical database. (This would be similar to the "bioguide" template used in article about current and former members of Congress, which yields "This article incorporates facts obtained from the public domain Biographical Directory of the United States Congress.") I hope to have these things done within the next couple of weeks, along with getting a few more articles written, and appreciate your noticing and having categorized some of my work. Regards, Newyorkbrad 20:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] RE: Unblocking

Indeed, but NetSnipe is the one bothered about it :) —Xyrael / 21:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

What, people even remember that stuff? Old news, three weeks ago is an eternity ;). NoSeptember 21:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here

[edit] The Halo's RfA

NoSeptember... Thank you very much for your support in my request for adminship. Ultimately, no consensus was reached, and I failed to be promoted, but I am very grateful for your support. NoSeptember, you are one of my favourite admins, and one of the people that I most trust on wikipedia, your support and trust in me means a great deal. I hope one day to prove your trust in me right. Thank you so much :) Yours, Thε Halo Θ 22:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Werdnabot

Good idea - I'll try and remember that in future. The reason for not using a manual revert was the sheer volume of necessary reverts - in the time it would have taken, it's possible the users would have made other changes, and the whole thing would have been even more tangled. Hope that makes sense, and thanks for the advice. —Xyrael / 09:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] RfA chart

Thanks for your comments about my chart. I don't think that I skipped many RfAs in May/June/July so it is probably fairly complete in terms of the RfAs in that time period. The chart is hard to maintain and it is also pretty hard to be bothered to update it. I haven't been participating in RfAs much after July 2006, mainly due to being in my last year of high school and having to constantly study for tests and exams. I occasionally have participated and I haven't updated the chart for these few RfAs after July 2006. DarthVader 06:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] Response to your question

Thanks for your inquiry. I was editing normally yesterday, not off-line, but at a relative's house on a different machine from the ones I normally use, and there may have been some issue with the settings. Thanks for noting the problem; I will see if it affected any other articles, and I don't anticipate doing any more editing from that computer. I wonder if a technophile might be able to guess what the problem with that particular machine was, but hopefully it's a moot issue. Regards, Newyorkbrad 14:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here

[edit] The Eloquence as Steward controversy

• 00:13, 26 September 2006 Tim Starling makes Eloquence a Steward.
• 15:18, 26 September 2006 NoSeptember adds Eloquence to Active Stewards list.
• Oscar starts a thread on Foundation-I about Eloquence's Steward status.
• 09:47, 27 September 2006 Eloquence removes his Steward status.
• 10:08, 27 September 2006 Oscar reverts NoSeptember.
• Oscar initiates another round of discussion.
• For the record, Eloquence and Oscar were 1st and 3rd respectively in the recent Foundation Board election.

[edit] Huh?

Does this mean you are leaving or something? GeorgeMoney (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I have it on good authority that this user is not leaving. If he was, he would say so explicitly. See his Leaving essay. He may be a bit busy though. A Guy Who Knows (talk) 21:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I see. Thank you mr. know-it-all :) GeorgeMoney (talk) 23:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Related talk: here and here

[edit] Thank you note

Hi there, NoSeptember. Thank you for your message re:CheckUser rights. Yes, it's been 2,5 months since my original request, but there it is, all done. :)
I shall do my best to live up to the trust bestowed upon me. Cheers, Redux 00:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Admin Request Wikipedia:Peer review/Hungarian Revolution of 1956

Don't ask me how it happened, but Wikipedia:Peer review/Hungarian Revolution of 1956 (should ot exist) needs to be merged with Wikipedia:Peer Review/Hungarian Revolution of 1956 (correct name). Thanks! (And, is there a general page for making Admin requests?)--Paul 15:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template for Biographical Directory of Federal Judges

As you may remember, I'm in the process of drafting stubs or short articles on federal judges (Samuel Mandelbaum, which I think is pretty decent actually, is the most recent). I try to include a couple of references, but sometimes I am just creating the basic stub-type article in the hope that someone will write more about the judge later. On a couple of the recent stubs I drafted, an RC patroller appended an "unsourced" template. The basic information for these articles comes from the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges maintained by the Federal Judicial Center, but I hadn't been mentioning that in every article/stub I drafted.

In doing some work on Congressional articles, I noticed that they have a template reflecting when material for the articles has been derived from the Congressional Biographical Directory. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S._Congress/Bioguide if you're not familiar with it. With that in mind, I just drafted the article Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. If you have a second, would you let me know if you think creating a similar kind of a template for this site as for the congressional one makes any sense? And if so, if you could point me to the tutorial page for how to create a template, as I've never made one before, that would also be outstanding. Thanks and regards, Newyorkbrad 23:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:LA

Hey NoSeptember, long time, no see. :) I was wondering how you liked the new changes I made to WP:LA (i.e) the TOC and updating. Regards — Moe 01:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The TOC is the biggest improvement to the page, I thought it looked neat :) Well, I try to follow the same guidelines as Steve Block's script, but at times it was tough to consider what was active or semi-active. It was also sad seeing all the admins that I had to place under Inactive because how long they have been out :( Sorry for making have to update your List of admins page so frequently, I just couldn't help myself :) — Moe 19:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your Admin List.

Hi NoSeptember, I'm just wondering about your chart that shows Wikipedia administrators in Your Wikipedia Administrator Chart. Is it special for creating this: User:NoSeptember/List of Administrators? I'm just curious about your own administrator chart. So, Are there any section that is Administrator Who is non-active or semi-active? Or Can I help you to organize your admin section? If one Wikipedian becomes administrator then I can put his/her ID on your chart. I have one thing to ask you about something. Does Color represent the Date that he/she became administrator? Please respond in my talk-page. Cheers. Daniel5127 (Talk) 06:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation

I invite you to join the Pornography in the United States GA for some copyedit (particularly for punctuation and the usage of prepositions), but feel free to edit it anyway. Cheers, --Brand спойт 10:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re:WP:LA

I was just thinking about asking Rick Block about combining the active and semi-actives. I was just thinking the same thing (theres no real distinction between the two). As long as we can tell inactive from active, I think thats all thats really needed. Thanks for letting me know, BTW. :) — Moe 13:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

What? I'm not obsessed with keeping it perfect.... I don't have a problem.. :) Well, I asked Rick about it and we'll see what he says about this suggestion.. but I'm not obsessing over it :) — Moe 14:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Federal Judge articles

Following up on something we discussed awhile back, please see here and let me know what you think. Thanks, Newyorkbrad 21:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Looks good to me. I'm glad to see you've finally jumped in with the creating of templates :). NoSeptember 16:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, although a couple of people at the Project Law page have indicated the name I gave it isn't exactly memorable, so I'm giving them a couple of days to decide on a new one. :) Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] from Dennis

My name is Dennis. I am new to editing.

Thanks. I'll keep working on it.

Dennis, 12 November 2006

[edit] Potential Errors

I think I found some errors that I don't know how to correct. They are on the electoral college maps located on each election year's map of the United States.

I believe the electoral votes for the 1904 election should have Minnesota at 11 and Missouri at 18.

Also I believe the 1932 map should have Pennsylvania at 36

Dennis, 12 November 2006

I replied here. Your IP address changes, if you create an account it will help you receive messages intended for you. NoSeptember 01:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for November 13th.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)