User talk:ThomasK
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is this the cocksucking wikipedia as it presents itself? to block the honest and let the real vandalizer get away with it? eg. the now very known articles manipulated. This ip adress is shared by dozen of users who want contribute to this shit.
This really isn't the appropriate way to go about trying to get unblocked. --Cyde↔Weys 08:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
and this isn't the appropriate way to establish wikipedia as a serious envyclopedia. unblock. no email adress user
Hey ThomasK, who is this User:Zui1 who deleted many times the content of your talk page? And what happened to your account? It is used to vandalize. Someone offended Jimbo Wales on his user page. Can you prove you are the real ThomasK? Question Point 09:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Additionally, you left in October 2005. You returned not much ago, and you blanked some pages. You got blocked by User:Curps. What's going on? Question Point 09:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, I think this is not possible but i´m. As I said above this is a ip adress and account shared by some dozens of users here. Difficult to find out who did this. --ThomasK 09:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Are you saying YOUR ACCOUNT IS SHARED? Are you using ThomasK as a public account? Question Point 09:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I don´t but the ip adress is the same on dozens on computers and sometimes someone can break into the account too. Question. who are you you just registered, e.g this happens here too and the account goes blocked --ThomasK 09:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm just a guy who saw your strange situation, and was curious. Your ip address is shared by many users, OK. But, to use your account, a person HAS to know the password. The only case you can get blocked is (i think): the ip address is used by someone to vandalize (by someone who desn't use an account), and you (unfortunately) are autoblocked if a sysop blocked the vandal. Why don't you write you IP address here, so an admin can unblock you? Question Point 09:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I don´t have to write the ip here that they unblock the ip adress. Admins know it anyhow, too. They did it one already before.--ThomasK 09:23, 29 May 2006
User:Zui1 has stated he is not a sockpuppet of yours. But he wrote it in a manner that resembles yours. Who is Zui1? Why did he blank several times your talk page? Question Point 09:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I don´t know, but I try to find out. Cyde or any other admin: UNBLOCK. Or wikipedia reputation is gone; actually it is already for a long time (since the beginning). --ThomasK 09:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
OK, i'm sick of using a sock. Question Point is me. Admins can check it. I'm just curious, how could an account be hijacked in this strange manner? A user vanishes, then returns suddenly and starts blanking pages. It's mysterious. QuakeRanger | Talk 09:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
The only thing i can say is "assume good faith". Hope you return to contribute well, Thomas. QuakeRanger | Talk 09:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
TO ALL ADMINS: UNBLOCK TO ALL ADMINS: UNBLOCK . TO ALL ADMINS: UNBLOCK TO ALL ADMINS: UNBLOCK TO ALL ADMINS: UNBLOCK
- Unblocked denied. Also see User_talk:Mnbvcxy who sounds just like you, claims not to be you and just so happened to request an unblock with the summary "UNBLOCK DEMAND" at exactly the same time as you. --pgk(talk) 09:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:2TBJayN04.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:2TBJayN04.jpeg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Image:Fatboy slim.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fatboy slim.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --– Quadell (talk) (random) 21:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)