User:Bov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you haven't already guessed, I'm a 9/11 researcher and work on the 9/11 pages. Do I have a neutral point of view on this issue? I do scientific research as a career, so I understand how science works. Saying that anything except a government version of an event is 'conspiracy theory' is not science or truth, but politics. The relevance of the 9/11 issue is that politics has thwarted science, the same way this has happened for many assassinations and events with polticial relevance. People who care deeply about truth and science are caught in a dilemma when fascism starts because those entrusted to tell the truth - the media - become mouthpieces for corporate and government agendas. A vicious cycle begins.
Please help stop the vicious cycle and stop labeling people with 'conspiracy theory' on wikipedia everytime someone is asking a question or presenting evidence that doesn't fit. Instead, present the facts as you understand them and help work towards consensus on descriptive terms when conflict arises.
