Talk:Brympton d'Evercy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Brympton d'Evercy is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review.
Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}} |
The page failed the above nomination with the following edit summary [1] This is not the case as is easily verified the page is fully referenced. Giano | talk 19:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- third of it has no footnotes and is thus unsourced - what a joke! GAs are not meant to be as fully worked up as FAs! Honestly, what is the point? -- ALoan (Talk) 21:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Do not insult my English ALoan, my meaning is perfectly clear - why are you writing in those mean letters? Giano | talk 10:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
