User talk:Chensiyuan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Date formatting
Hi there - just a quick note. I saw you made a load of changes to dates in footballer players' articles at the moment, most of them good. However, although I think it is a good idea to change standalone years to seasons, e.g. "x won an FA Cup in 1998" → "x won an FA Cup in 1997-98"; when it comes to specifying particular dates, e.g. "y was signed by Arsenal on April 6, 2006", it is probably best to keep the date format exactly like that, instead of piping the year link to the relevant season. That's how the Manual of Style specifies how exact dates should be formatted, and to use football season wikilinks breaks the way users' date preferences are displayed. So it's probably best to leave that kind of date alone.
Sorry for the bother - most of the edits you made were good ones, just alerting you to a minor quibble. Cheers. Qwghlm 22:51, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Eversince
Hi Siyuan, I have come across the article you created on Eversince. Unfortunately I feel that it would probably fail an AfD vote due to it controvening WP:NOT, specifically "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought". However, I thought I would give you the opportunity to either move it to your user area,(user:Chensiyuan\Eversince), or convince me that it should be kept before I list it. I really do not like listing articles for deletion when effort has been clearly put into them. Yours, Rje 01:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Friedricesg.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Friedricesg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
Hey, just a barnstar to know your contributions are valued, for all your edits. At the same time, I encourage you to comment on the various discussion pages as several proposals are going on, as the Singapore article went through its fifth FAC not too long ago. Also, perhaps you want to create a photo gallery? Anyway, keep up the good work!
The Original Barnstar | ||
I, Natalinasmpf award Chensiyuan this barnstar for his valued contributions and images. I voice my thanks for the thousands of edits he has made. Cheers, and stick around! Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 23:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Email
Hello, could you please specify your email address so others can contact you about private, personal and other things. Thanks. --Terence Ong 07:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Meetup
We're having a meetup on 23 June. Put your name here if you're interested. We're meeting Angela Beesley!-Cheers!----陈鼎翔 贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RE:Water Margin table
Hi, thanks for the message. When I'm done with adding the tables to every one of the 108 Heroes (you could help too :D ) they'll all appear in the category Water Margin characters. That category is a subcategory of Category:Water Margin, and the "villains", if they were previously in the "Water Margin" category will still be there. I'm not actually deleting the category "Water Margin", just moving the appropriate ones to a subcategory of that.
BTW, if you have a list of all the villains in the novel you can add them to the table. I don't remember all of them (and there isn't a readily-available list like the heroes) so I didn't add them, but I left some space (commented out) in Template:Water Margin characters. And I deliberately made it "characters" so villains could be added too. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 03:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help adding the list of heroes! -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 07:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- most welcome Chensiyuan 13:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Amie Huguenard
This was a non-notable biography according to WP:BIO. Being the girlfriend of someone famous doesn't make that person famous in their own right. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- your deletion was flagrantly arbitrary. did you even watch the documentary, or perform a google? the wiki:bio guide is far from the gospel truth, and even if i did adhere to it, the article could have stood. Chensiyuan 15:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- 20 seconds is what you took for you to delete an article without blinking. i have been waiting for more than 5 minutes for a reply. this does not look right. Chensiyuan 15:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Not arbitrary - WP:BIO#Deceased_people asks "Has the person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in the specific field?" This is something that the article doesn't answer. Your question to me predicates knowledge of the subject. The article should provide the information in order that an understanding of the individual's notable status doesn't rest on also having seen a documentary. If the facts in the article are present and complete then the question need not arise and notability will be clear from the biographical details. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- it is people like you who believe in your own hype that many wikipedians, seasoned ones or new, find frustrating to contribute to anything. the article doesn't answer everything the guidelines dictate, simply because the writing of one is an ongoing process. it is unrealistic to expect a single person to complete the writing of a full article in one seating. Chensiyuan 15:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
My motivation is not egotistical, it was merely an answer to the above question posed in WP:BIO. I agree that to expect a full biography in one terminal session is an unrealistic objective. That is why Sandboxes exist or are created, in order to preserve articles-in-progress from deletion until they are released. Your twenty-second comment above did not demonstrate my arbitrary or mercenary behaviour, rather it is indicative of the time required to read the article-as-presented. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ashley Cole
Thanks for telling me about that apps and goal thing, I didn't know :) I deleted the England Squad- 2006 World Cup box because the World Cup is over. Otherwise, why not add the England Squad- 2002 World Cup or England Squad- Euro 2004 etc etc? I guess I should have noted why, but I thought it was kinda obvious. Again, thanks for telling me. --Ealgian 23:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Ealgian
[edit] Montreal's image
Hello Chensiyuan. Yes, it's me that replaced your image. If there's something that you don't like, you can modify it by yourself or put your image instead. Thanks for informing me! Regards, Arthur 23 July 2006
{unblock}
- We can't unblock you at this time, because you haven't given us the information we need to even look into your block. You yourself were not blocked; if you were prevented from editing, you must have been autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. I'm removing your unblock request because there's nothing we can do without this information. If you still want to be unblocked, feel free to add the {{unblock}} tag back to this page, and be sure to include the message you saw when you tried to edit, including the IP address. This is what the message looks like. Without that information, we can't help you. Mangojuicetalk 15:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Anti-christ has been warned
The comments left by User:Anti-christ have been deleted on the Lin Chong page. Earlier today I sent an email to the administrators about his misconduct and they wrote me back saying he had been given a warning. I honestly believe he should be blocked from editing altogether and his account should be deleted. But I'm not an administrator. (!Mi luchador nombre es amoladora de la carne y traigo el dolor! 05:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC))
[edit] Rosicky
Considering you add "Arsenal Statistics" how about doing some of the hard work and add in the Dortmund and Sparta Prague statistics too instead of leaving someone else do the hard work Niall123 21:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
not sure what you're talking about - i've been responsible for putting up stats for almost all the contemporary arsenal players, some dating back to 1995-96. i can't put up stats for their previous careers with other clubs because such stats are not easily available or they can't quite be verified. hence only arsenal stats are provided. your comment is rude and redundant. Chensiyuan 01:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Flamini
Thanks for letting me know. DavidJJJ 16:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alan Moroney
Not sure how to reply to a private message, so apologies for doing it this way. "It also cements Singapore's place as one the modern world's most sexist nations, as it cannot be applied to women or girls." Is blatantly true. What's the point? Surely it should be pointed out.
Alan
[edit] See Talk:Roti canai
Hello. There's a proposed move to Paratha, please voice your opinion at the above link. Thanks. --Terence Ong (T | C) 13:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Combined poster a4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Combined poster a4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Roses01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roses01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Warning templates
When warning users, please use templates on Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. It helps keep track of warnings. This is in response to you warning User:151.41.238.254 for an edit made to Thierry Henry. x42bn6 Talk 17:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Upload your pics to Commons
Hello, please upload your pictures to Wikimedia Commons, a shared media (image and audio) repository of Wikimedia, it's advisable to upload self-taken pictures to Commons, and can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. I can help you do it as part of my transwiki project, if you give me the green light, I will go ahead. And do upload there in future. Thanks. --Terence Ong (T | C) 08:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I may upload your pics under a different name for those such as Image:CIMG2583.JPG, please do rename your images before uploading. --Terence Ong (T | C) 12:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Meetup on 24 November
Hello, please confirm yourself for the meetup on the 24th by November 18. If you have any ideas or suggestions, please list them at the meetup page yourself. Thanks. --Terence Ong (C | R) 04:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- It seems all the local universities have the exams now. Am I right? --Terence Ong (C | R) 10:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- yes that seems to be the case. Chensiyuan 11:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding a comment on a user page...
I noticed that you had replied to a user talk page, calling the anonymous poster a "loser." I would avoid responding that way due to WP:CIVIL. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 01:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)