User talk:Cjosefy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] John Denver Discography
Hey, thanks for the help with uploading the album covers! Editor19841 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] STS-115
Thanks for pointing out my (rather large) mistake. :) Palebluedots 20:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Saturn V infobox
Template:Saturn V infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | Chess | E-mail 20:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Excuse me?
Where do you get off threatening me for my edits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.126.143.59 (talk • contribs) 13:43, August 25, 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Smashing Pumpkins
I would just like to say nice job on the SP page. Thanks alot for uploading those promo photos too, thats awesome. I think now we have enough images to completely rid of the album covers, especially since I completed the Post break-up project I had. --Reaper X 03:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, thats awesome. Could you please upload the photo from Machina/Machines of God (promo) too? -- Janadore 19:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] cleanup tag
Please do not take the cleanup tag personally. An editor believes that the article needs cleanup and has tagged it as such, with agreement from at least one other editor. Discussion has now occurred on the talk page regarding the matter, and deletion of the tag without significant editing or community consensus may be construed as vandalism (or trigger a 3RR violation or edit war over a tag). It's not a reflection on you or your work - we just want to make the article better. Why not help by editing the article instead of the tag? :) Girolamo Savonarola 20:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, I see where you were coming from, but the whole point of assume good faith is to "assume" it. As per the policy: Assume that others are trying to help Wikipedia rather than harm it, unless there is clear and present evidence to the contrary. Even if misguided or improperly done, the legitimacy of the tag is in the fact that an editor has in good faith tried to add the tag to bring attention the article so as to improve it. Not to point it out as flawed (except in order that it may be fixed). Girolamo Savonarola 20:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Space Shuttle Atlantis
Hi, thanks for undoing Rebecca's revert of my date edit at Space Shuttle Atlantis. You may be aware of this, but she has promised several different editors that she will revert each such edits. If you look at her contributions, you will see that she has used the admin rollback tool to do exactly that.
Several editors are also complaining to her about incivility. See her talk page, and comments she has made elsewhere. Regards. bobblewik 18:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Zwan promo 2003.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zwan promo 2003.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok 01:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
