Talk:Drukqs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
A masterpeice. Suggest replacing the CD cover art with the larger Vinyl box art. --Insomniak 08:50, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I've been listening to this album for 4 years, and only after reading this article have I finally gotten the pun in the title! Surely it is indeed intended to be "druk-Qs"! Sadly most copies of the CD seem to come with a silly sticker on the front with the titles, because Warp seem to think that otherwise we wouldn't spot who the album was by!--feline1 13:01, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Question: does anyone know what the cover art is? like on http://www.drukqs.net/. Is it part of a musical instrument?
- Isn't that the strikers in a player piano?
[edit] So-called "Easter Eggs"
That thing about the "Easter Eggs" where you play tracks of Drukqs at the same time to discover incredible new sound worlds is the biggest pile of shit I have ever read.
- Although I wouldn't use that choice in words, I have to agree. I attempted to to overlap the suggested songs in Audacity, but only got poor results. I am striking this "easter eggs" section from the article. --Insomniak 22:58, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree, either your version of DrukQs had unusual time recording delays or you simply didn't like it. I took the liberty of recording and trying the Easter Eggs myself and found it worked, ive uploaded one of the combinations on here and if you had a listen you wouldn't call it a 'pile of shit'. I will therefore revert back the Easter Eggs section --Raddicks 17:47, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for providing an example of your claim (although your link may have to be edited out for copyright concern). It's certainly very fascinating, but there is no way to know if this is just a beatmatched edit, and I'm still speculative of your claim. I'm going to make a few changes to the "easter eggs" section to reflect the speculative nature of this claim, rather than to state it as fact. PS: the proper grammer is "secretly mastered", not "mastered secretly". --Insomniak 19:20, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
-
- Beatmapping i did with acid music studio 5 which is on automatic for me but i was unaware of a slight beat-delay when played manually without beatmapping. Knowing Richard he would likely pull stunts like this, ever heard of his spectrograph stunt with Windowlicker? [instructions can be found here]. That's some fun for you. PS: The proper spelling is "simultaneously", not "simultainiously". Hehehe sorry i couldn't help myself - best regards --Raddicks 19:58, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Seems like a coincidence. Make an external website and link to it from the article? Too much importance placed on a trivial coincidence.Joyrex 12:11, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
-
I tried to listen to a "combination" of tracks... interesting. But not amazing.
I've heard Analord has a unique sound when played at a different speed. Family Guy Guy 03:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Anyone know translations for all the tracks? It would make a dandy addition to the article.--TimJing 02:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
