User talk:Duffer1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
RE: Revert of controversies page: Reversion without discussion as usual... Welcome to Wikipedia. You reverted my mods to the "Controversies..." page without any explanation. My mods were not "NPOV" imho - how on earth is anything truly "non-point of view"?? That's impossible. Every human writing represents the point of view of someone, and so does this controversies article. My edits were more concise by far, and gave a better overview of the issues here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.176.149.50 (talk • contribs) . 11:53, July 27, 2006
Um, Matt? Those edits by 24.224.182.82 (talk • contribs) we actually good, and were a fine foundation for good intro summary paragraphs. The place for sourcing is in the expository body of the article. Previously, editors were warned not to mention topics in the intro that were not covered with sourced material in the body. Perhaps we could use those edits as a start? - CobaltBlueTony 17:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses
So, do you think I did a good job, or did I acquiesce (sp.?) too much? - CobaltBlueTony 01:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] JW's#blood
Might need some help with this Ben doesn't like my addition.George 12:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
