User talk:Feitclub
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Feitclub and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
[edit] The Links is allowed it is not vandalism
"Bullying, or stubbornness: Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them on an article's talk page, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is a matter of regret — you may wish to see our dispute resolution pages to get help. However, it is not vandalism. "
"Spam Adding inappropriate external links "
The link is very appropriate, right on topic in fact, it is only placed once and does not go against any of the guidelines of wikipedia... and so just give up already, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is 'wrong'
- Say something on the talk page if you like, but I'm not the only user who thinks we don't need a link to a fan page. --Feitclub 03:55, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)
-
- where's the talk page? Just because YOU do not need it, does not mean other's won't find it useful. 5000 + people a day find that link useful
-
- At the top of (nearly) every page, there is a "discussion" link. If you want to defend your changes, post something there. Your IP address has a page too, where two users besides myself have asked you to stop. It's not just me, please don't make this personal. --Feitclub 03:59, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)
-
-
- OK, I just figured out how to edit that page (didn't realize I couldn't do it from ON that page ... so I will defend the link there.
-
[edit] Legend of Zelda edits
Good work on The Legend of Zelda! Some details about the game itself were just what that article needed. Derrick Coetzee 08:16, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
[edit] rv
Thank you very much for reverting my user and talk pages. Mike H 00:44, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
- No problem, although it seems I've drawn his ire now. --Feitclub 01:09, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
-
- [I've decided to remove a "comment," as the user who left has been banned, and it was little more than a personal attack on myself and the other users. If you want to read it, use the "history" tab at the top of the screen]
You don't have to put up with all that stuff on your user page, you know. You can revert all that. Mike H 02:19, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
Maybe I should erase it, or at least remove the nasty parts. I think the more his work is recognized the more fun he has doing it. --Feitclub 12:48, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Superfans
Hey, thanks a load for editing that Superfan page. I just threw it up there, but you my friend had done it some justice. Here's a gold star. Skrew ball 01:57, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fight Club
I've taken all of the film-specific info from Fight Club and put it into the film article. The film article needs some work (it's kind of lacking right now, since I only moved info over with minimal adjustments), so I suggest now would be the time to add in what you were planning to add. -- [[User:LGagnon|LGagnon]] 21:14, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Chuck Palahniuk photos
Have you developed those photos of Chuck Palahniuk yet? The article is still in need of some. -- [[User:LGagnon|LGagnon]] 21:41, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
Sorry to bug you again, but I was just wondering if you were still going to add a photo for the article. If not, I suggest letting it be known on the article's talk page so that someone else will step up to add one. -- [[User:LGagnon|LGagnon]] 04:58, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
- The photo is finally up! I cropped myself out of the shot and hopefully I attached the proper copyright notice. --Feitclub 05:00, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Can You Help Me? (24.70.95.203)
You're quite welcome; I'm a bit scattered tonight so I've not been watching RC as closely as I usually would. I'm sorry it took so long to resolve the problem. But you're right; you should take the vandal's article as a sign of good work on your part. You'll know you've reached the next level when you've been goatsed or tubgirled. ;) Cheers, -- Hadal 07:39, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] On White Castle
Hey, I reverted parts of your edits to the White Castle movie -- according to the style guide, it is improper to change articles that are originally written with British spellings of words (colour) with American spellings, and vice versa. --Improv 04:15, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- My thinking was two-fold on that. First, I wikified coloured and that article was very different than colored. Secondly, I thought an article about an American film about Americans would make more sense using the American spelling. But the style guide doesn't back that up, so as long as the link still goes to colored and not coloured, I don't see a problem with that. Of course, it might be better to drop the whole idea entirely. Are their Jewish friends really "colored" or "coloured?" --Feitclub 04:19, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Clone High
Hi, regarding your note on Talk:Clone High--was there a controversy about Gandhi? I didn't hear of it, probably because I watched the show through BitTorrent rather than on TV. If you could add to the article, I'd be grateful. Yours, Meelar (talk) 21:30, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, there was. I'm trying to find a decent weblink to corroborate the story. Most Google results are fanpages or random blogs. --Feitclub 21:49, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Counting edits
Hey. I was reading your userpage and saw that you wondered about a way to quickly count edits. A while ago I stumbled upon Kate's tool which allows you to do exactly that. I hope it helps. --NormanEinstein 03:09, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! I've linked that on my user page now. --feitclub 05:17, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Hello fellow editcountitus victim. 8-) If you like Kate's tool, check out the one by Interiot! http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Feitclub&dbname=enwiki_p Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Oooh, it has graphs! And color-coded ones at that! Thanks a lot! --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 03:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WBC
Thanks man, it looked like it needed a little ambiance to it, its the World Cup of baseball ;-) --Shaunnol 07:25, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] JoJo / Shonen Jump
That's great, and what's better is that I didn't realize there was a page for Hirohiko yet, now I won't lose any more sleep over thinking about starting the article! —Philip Nilsson 13:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- I do wish you would come back and help with the article. I have been thinking of making Individual articles for each Jojo. - Malomeat 18:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your signature
I noticed that you used a template for your signature here. It is generally recommended that you don't because:
- It places greater strain on the Wikipedia servers.
- It lends itself to vandalism.
You can still you a template, but you should use the subst command, i.e. type {{subst:User:Feitclub/sig}} instead. It'll still look the same though. Cheers. enochlau (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the warning. I'll try something else, as I don't want to bother typing out that code all the time. Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions)
[edit] Thank you
I don't know who or why someone would vandalise White Mountain art. I am the major contributor to the article, and I am watching the article, so I'm very disturbed by the vandalism. How do you know that it's been vandalized? And, is there some way that I can monitor and reverse such edits? Thank you for being a good person. JJ 03:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dragon Ball Z
Saying that there 'is no Dragon Ball Z manga' when there IS, shows that you might want to do a bit more research before 'correcting' DBZ related wikipages. The manga of Dragon Ball Z is what the anime series of the same name was based on. I'm not why you are confused about the existence of a DBZ manga, but hopefully you will look up proof on your own time, if you don't believe me, rather than mindlessly reverting changes like some people on here. I'm not suggesting that you are mindless, or the type to do such a thing, merely that I hope you are not. Thank you for your time.
Daishokaioshin 02:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- The manga is called Dragonball. From that manga, they made two animated series Dragonball and Dragonball Z. So there is no DBZ manga, unless you consider the English-translated issues of DB that have been retroactively re-titled DBZ (which I believe was only done in the US). But is that really manga? I'm not so sure. Besides, if that's the case than Super Saiyajin and Vegeta only appear in the DBZ "manga." Also note the lack of any DBZ manga article, while DB has both a manga and an anime article. I admit I may have been a little rash to declare DBZ manga as non-existant. It is, perhaps, an over-simplification. But the fact is that DB and DBZ are both from the same manga. To claim that there is a DBZ manga in certain articles when the DBZ article clearly defines it as an animated series is confusing at best and misleading at worst in my opinion. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 11:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
In response to your comment on my talk page: Perhaps you missed the part where I said "I am not suggesting that you are mindless". I know it's right there in what I said and obvious that I wasn't using condescending language, so of course you would think I was saying and doing the exact opposite of what I was doing. After all, I'm just some person, right? No reason to pay attention to what I say, because you don't know me, and thus I am not important.
I was corrected on my error, and you may note that on the talk page for Super Saiyan I said as much, and apologized for being mistaken. Seriously. Please read carefully before flinging around accusations of people being insulting and condescending. I have no problem with you, and was "keeping my cool" perfectly well. If you misunderstood what I said, then sorry, but I'm not sure how to make it anymore clea--Oh wait, here's a method. Ahem. I DO NOT THINK YOU ARE MINDLESS OR ANYTHING ELSE NEGATIVE. I was stating that SOME PEOPLE on here will revert all changes made to an article back to an older version that is incorrect, without even seeing what fixes have been made, merely because THEY seem to just do the same "mindless" activity over and over without even thinking for a moment that other people are putting in hard work to fix an article, and they are causing an unnecessary amount of additional work to have to be put in on correcting the article over and over because they won't stop changing it back.
Once again, just so it is clear: I AM NOT SUGGESTING THAT YOU DO SUCH THINGS. There is someone else, an anonymous user, who has consistently displayed this behavior. It is he or she that I was referencing in my original comment, and NOT YOU.
If you took any of what I just said as antagonistic, insulting, or condescending, then I am not sure what else to do. It was not my intent to insult you. I have no negative opinions about you.
Thanks for your time.
Daishokaioshin 03:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- I have responded to this comment on your talk page. I don't think we need to apologize to each other anymore. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 13:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] HIStory
RE: comments on my talk pages and on "Can't sleep, clown will eat me" talk pages. For your information I was willing to compromise and even changed the word "brilliant" to an adjective with lesser definition (good) a few edits back so to compromise like android79 said – obviously it did not go down well as it got changed again. And if you see from HIStory's history page I was the one who gave in and stopped the re-editing/reversing by reverting the page back to the version you and Funky Monkey wanted - and I've gone into this into more detail on HIStory's talk pages. I didn't go out to cause offensive, bother or annoyance (which I see over the past days I have) so sorry for doing so, its just I felt the need to write some sort of acknowledgement of YRNA's achievements, and I still fell I'm right by doing so, but as I’ve been back into a corner, and subsequently got block for making edits for a while I give in and will keep that part of the page how it currently is. Don't fell bad for not suggesting a better course of action for me, it’s my fault for being childish - I am not an experienced computer user and wasn't familiar with wikipedia rules and regulation, though am now. As for not being missed, I've changed my mind and am not going anywhere, so sorry but you wont have to not miss me. Any communication with me in the future will have to be done on these talk pages, as I have know idea of how to use net sent for comm. Sorry again, hope everything is fine. fr. Appropiate Appropiate 16:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Really? The edits I saw were always "brilliant." Well, glad you haven't given up then. I think the best way to resolve this is to find some kind of standard that demonstrates that the chart performance was particularly notable (is twenty weeks extremely uncommon?) and then cite that as "evidence" for adding an adjective to the objective fact. Even then, a word like "notable" or "surprising" sounds less POV than "brilliant." --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 01:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tool-assistance improvement drive
Hi Feitclub. Since you're a Wikipedian and also a member of Bisqwit's site, I'd like to direct your attention to the tool-assisted speedrun article, which I would like to do an improvement drive for this weekend. I'll personally be editing it heavily to try to bring it up to the status of good article, but I'll need the help of good editors who know a lot about the phenomenon. It would be great if you could help out! The talk page contains some information that you could get started with. In case you're up for some editing, see you there! —Michiel Sikma, 06:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] LOL!
It's all in the wrist, ya know. :) An old bug in the software occasionally credited a speedy deletion candidate to the poor slob who tried tagging it! Thanks for the note. Made my night. - Lucky 6.9 02:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
