Logic in China
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Please expand this article. Further information might be found in a section of the talk page or at Requests for expansion. |
In the history of logic, logic in China plays a particularly interesting role due to its length and relative isolation from the strong current of development of the study of logic in Europe and the Islamic world.
Contents |
[edit] Confucian legalism
During the imperial era of China, the two philosophies of Confucianism and Legalism created an extremely advance and efficent form of government. A result of Confucian and Legalist principles was the creation of the bureaucracy in government, a standardized and methodical system of management.
[edit] Legalism
Legalism is the totalitarian pragmatic political philosophy of Han Fei, with maxims like "when the epoch changed, the ways changed" as its essential principle, than a jurisprudence. In this context, "legalism" here can bear the meaning of "political philosophy that upholds the rule of law", and is thus distinguished from the word's Western sense. Legalism takes an extreme cynnical approach to governance; only allowing realistic, oppose to idealistic, thinking.
[edit] Mohist logic
In China, a contemporary of Confucius, Mozi, "Master Mo", is credited with founding the Mohist school, whose canons dealt with issues relating to valid inference and the conditions of correct conclusions.
The Mohist school of Chinese philosophy contained an approach to logic and argumentation that stresses analogical reasoning over deductive reasoning, and is based on the three fa, or methods of drawing distinctions between kinds of things.
One of the schools that grew out of Mohism, the Logicians, are credited by some scholars for their early investigation of formal logic.
[edit] Daoist skepticism
[edit] The repression of the study of logic
Unfortunately, due to the harsh rule of Legalism in the subsequent Qin Dynasty, this line of investigation disappeared in China until the introduction of Indian philosophy and Indian logic by Buddhists. However it never really caught on and is almost complete speculation by modern historians.
