Portal talk:Medicine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
|
|
|
|
 work & Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) |
 |
For discussion about Portals generally, please see the WikiProject on Portals. |
 |
The Medicine Portal is a featured portal, which means it has been identified as one of the best portals on Wikipedia. If you see a way this portal can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute. |
[edit] Improvement drive
A related article, Obesity, is currently nominated to be improved on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. Please vote for this article there.--Fenice 08:38, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Main page redesign
There is discussion going on now regarding the Main page redesign and linking portals (more prominently) from the main page to allow users to more easily browse Wikipedia. The discussion specifically concerns Portal:Health and Portal:Medicine. I want to bring these concerns to your attention, as editors interested/experts in Medicine (and probably health too). -Aude (talk | contribs) 02:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Please comment at either Wikipedia talk:Portal and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft.
[edit] portal:Health
I think the portal:Health could use some major work. See my comments on the discussion page there, and if you would like to help out please do.--Chinawhitecotton 08:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Scientific peer review
A scientific peer review has been started and we're looking for Wikipedians who are members of the scientific academic community to run for the board. If you want to give it a shot come over and post a little about yourself. New nominations are being accepted until the 00:00 on the 17th March.
The project aims to combine existing peer review mechanisms (Wikipedia peer review, featured article candidate discussion, article assessment, &c.) which focus on compliance to manual of style and referencing policy with a more conventional peer review by members of the scientific academic community. It is hoped that this will raise science-based articles to their highest possible standards. Article quality and factual validity is now Wikipedia's most important goal. Having as many errors as Britannica is not good–we must raise our standards above this. --Oldak Quill 18:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Section headings
With the Misc:Auto-number headings preference checked, the section headings are displaying a number before the heading. This is different than the other portals which are not using auto-generated heading— it would be better if the numbers weren't displayed. (I don't have time to look at this right now...) —Doug Bell talk•contrib 12:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Latin terminology
Latin terminology in Anatomy, Histology, Physiology would be a great addition
[edit] Chronic granulomatous disease
Somebody should add the first successful gene therapy [1] (pdf) --De.Gerbil 10:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for the link. NCurse 06:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Changes
As far as I can see, not too many editor work on this portal. If you don't mind, I've made some changes, and I plan to continue this work. If somebody doesn't agree with that, just write to me. Thanks. NCurse 05:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- You are doing a great job! --WS 23:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it's looking fantastic! InvictaHOG 00:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Liposculpture
Liposculpture is a refinement of Liposuction and implies a more artistic approach to sculpturing, typically involving the removal of more fat, more agressively, more superficially and yet with a smoother result having fewer dents and dimples and less asymmetry.
[edit] Selected article nominations procedure
I've created:
- Category:Medicine portal
- Category:Medicine portal selected content
- and template : {{MedportalSAC}} which is added to the nominated article's talk page and shows that this article is a current selected article candidate on Medicine portal.
NCurse work 17:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Congratulations on featured portal!
Great work! InvictaHOG 10:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
congrats! nice job! :) – Alensha 寫 词 17:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) Also in the name of Stevenfruitsmaak. :) We worked together on that. NCurse work 17:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ophthalmology missing from the portal
The Medicine portal does not include eyes or feature Ophthalmology as a speciality! That is indeed strange considering that Ophthalmology encompasses a tremendous amount of medicine, besides surgical procedures. Eye complaints and their management is a very common medically managed issue. Being an eye specialist, I feel that it deserves inclusion in the portal and envisage a much wider role for portal as a whole for physicians and surgeons. Excluding other surgical specialities also is, IMO, not desirable. Could someone kindly take steps to ensure such an inclusion. EyeMD 14:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Category:Medical specialties already appears on the portal. Category:Ophthalmology is already listed as a subcategory of Category:Medical specialties. AED 17:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I thought so too, so I removed it again. We hold no grudge against ophtalmo, but mentioning all specialities would make the categories box pretty useless.--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 13:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Evidence basis of medicines and procedures
Hi all,
I'm a fairly new user with a big plan. As a practicing Pharmacist and trained research biochemist I'm aiming to add references to the evidence base of pharmaceutical products and medical procedures to each relevant article. I find it quite difficult to find a comprehensive library of articles relevant to the topic for which I am searching and feel that this is the best way to achieve that end. Further to this it would create an excellent research tool for students; each article essentially being a self-contained portal. So, what's everyone's opinion on this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drues (talk • contribs) .
- Great! It would be an important job, because references are the keypoints nowadays. Look, I think you could work nearly all kind of diseases related articles. If I can give you an advice, please work first on Most important genetic disorders. I help wherever you need. Good work! :) NCurse work 08:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Great idea! Hmm Ncurse trying to win a soul for your WikiProject :-D ? Anyway, look at the Portal page and you'll find many places to begin your project; maybe you'd like to join WikiProject Clinical medicine, sounds like something for you no?--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 12:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Boxes moved
I moved some of the boxes to avoid white space between them, although the order seems maybe less logical now. Ideas are welcome.--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 12:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- My problem is to show regularly changing boxes above the topics box. What if we move quotes (which I update regularly) below the DYK box and make images in selected images larger because now they're so small, it is even hard to read them. Then these boxes would be in the same level. Below topics box, categoris should be on the right side. I think it'd be the best solution. What do you think? NCurse work 16:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Yes, that would indeed be a better solution! I'll have a go at it, unless you want to spend your wikibreak on it :-) --Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 10:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
As another BOLD move, I've expanded the categories box, because there was only white space next to it that can be avoided this way. Comments are welcome.--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 19:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orthodontics
Dear colleges!
Would please have an eye on this article. Compare the diskussion in the german version de:Kieferothopädie. The user de:Benutzer:Dr. Georg Risse is owner of a company wich is propagating non standard therapeutic procedures. His contributions in the german wikipedia are biased and it was necessary to revert the article de:Kieferothopädie several times.
Greetings -- Andreas Werle 15:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
