User talk:MRSC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Please create headings when leaving me a message in the first instance. Thanks.
[edit] Archived talk
- /Archive 1 (1 September 2004 - 9 May 2005)
- /Archive 2 (20 June 2005 - 8 December 2005)
- /Archive 3 (12 December 2005 - 5 June 2006)
- /Archive 4 (6 June 2006 - 31 August 2006)
- /Archive 5 (1 September 2006 - 3 November 2006)
Contents |
[edit] Tulse Hill
Hi! Sorry to bother you, but I wondered if you wouldn't mind poping over to Tulse Hill where there is a danger of an edit war developing. I noticed you have been involed in Wikipedia:WikiProject London and have been active on other London pages. The dicussion is shown on Talk:Tulse Hill and I think a third party perspective may be of some help. Many thanks. Regan123 00:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not vandalise the article entitled "Tulse Hill" Alec - U.K. 07:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Asking not vandalise the article entitled "Tulse Hill" was neither a warning nor a threat but I felt that I ought to object to the message from Regan123 of 00:46, 4 November 2006, which seemed to me to be encouraging you to vandalise it. Alec - U.K. 07:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wigan
Hello, just to ask your opinion. User:Generic Character has redirected Wigan to Metropolitan Borough of Wigan and moved the contents there. I'm sure that this is not in line with the de facto convention of Town/district articles. What are your views? G-Man * 19:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Puppet Master
I'm increasingly concerned with User:Bailrigg. This user is an emerging Naming conventions/historic county offender.
As well as the sockpuppetry, vote rigging and breaches of the naming conventions, I feel that this user is not prepared to edit towards the establised consenus/policy. this misleading edit following multiple warnings demonstrates this.
I've left some stern words (again) at their talk page, as I do not believe they are editting in good faith. I wanted to contact a few of the editing community for support and advise. Jhamez84 23:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Replied to stern words at User_talk:Jhamez84 Bailrigg 23:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'd keep an eye on other comparable accounts as I am too - a user by the name of Selnec has just appeared with a similar editing agenda and, it seems, a comparable/high level of experience in editing. It seems the Greater Manchester coat of arms motto has never been so appropriate! I am concerned however. Jhamez84 22:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- What I was trying to imply is the possibility (given the histories and seemingly new found co-operation) that these two accounts are but one. The editing style is infact, exact. Jhamez84 22:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong string puller
- As to User:Selnec, you may be interested to look at the logfile. Jhamez84 00:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Support?
Apologies... any change of some support about Bailrigg - he's contravened 3RR and is making unnatural edits. I've left comments at his Talk page, but he's unwilling to engage in debate.
I've been patient, but think the next step such as WP:3O may curb his agenda. Jhamez84 17:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Sorry to butt in - I'd rather not have to. However, I must say I have replied to all of Jhamez84 's messages today so I don't know how that can be taken as being unwilling to engage in debate. As for 3RR I have replied at User talk:Jhamez84Bailrigg 17:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Closed railway terminals
While I accept that Holborn Viaduct can legitimately be included on the London railway station list, I think it's taking it a bit far to include Bishopsgate and Minories, since they were replaced by existing stations, not to mention the fact that there is no living memory of either of them. Taking that view, I think then that there is a case for including both Holborn Viaduct and Broad Street on the template {{Railway stations of London}}. Hammersfan 08/11/06, 12.35 GMT
[edit] UK School Boards
The ILEA seemed similar to the NYCDOE. The thing is that the ILEA doesn't exist anymore. BTW, all of New York City is more or less one municipality, while London is split between several "boroughs" WhisperToMe 22:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GOBLIN
I hope this doesn't go into an edit war. I see that over a year ago you reverted Our Phellap's move of the Gospel Oak to Barking line. May i ask why? Simply south 13:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I think it does as most lines in the UK use this capitalisation. I don't think i'm just going along with just consistency. Simply south 14:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Crystal Palace
Hello again. I was just looking at Crystal Palace, London but there seems to be something oddly familiar about the editing style going on. Maybe it is just me but would appreciate your thoughts. Regan123 22:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed change to UK stations infobox
See Template talk:Infobox UK station#Bilngual station names for my proposed way to standardise the formatting of stations that have names in more than one language (e.g. English and Welsh names). Thryduulf 22:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Need advice on UK railway stations
Please see my recent post in Template talk:Infobox UK station --ArmadilloFromHell 04:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Football problems
Your user page was blanked and there seems to be a tag team in action, I think the articles they are creating are hoaxes. I have to go off, so if you are online, you may want to watch them.
- Wikipedian14 (talk • contribs) User page blanking
- Sconeyj (talk • contribs)
- Md1234 (talk • contribs)
- Alfredlebum (talk • contribs)
- Lekan21 (talk • contribs) --ArmadilloFromHell 22:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Categories
If a category has subcategories, it is not empty and does not meet criteria for speedy deletion. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
