Ruins in the Gulf of Cambay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On May 19, 2001, India's science and technology minister Murli Manohar Joshi announced the finding of ruins in the Gulf of Khambat (formerly known as the Gulf of Cambay and more commonly spelled Khambhat). The ruins, known as the Gulf of Khambat Cultural Complex (GKCC), are located on the seabed of a nine-kilometer stretch off the coast of Gujarat province at a depth of about 40 m. The site was discovered by a team from the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT) in December 2000 and investigated for six months with acoustic techniques. The team identified city-like structures at the location, said to resemble those of major cities of the Indus Valley Civilisation, with regular geometric patterns representing a granary, a great bath and a citadel.

Gulf of Khambhat on the right. Image NASA Earth Observatory

However, many marine geologists, including those who are experienced with using sonar in studying underwater archaeological sites, are skeptical of the interpretations of the NIOT scientists. Geologists argue that the many of the "geometric patterns" seen on the sonar images which the NIOT team interpreted to be submerged structures, are instead obvious artifacts of the sonar imaging process itself. Where underlain by lithified sediments and bedrocks, the linear patterns interpreted to be the foundations and walls of man-made structures might represent nothing more than naturally-occurring orthogonal / rectilinear fracturing and jointing in the rock formations at the bottom of the Gulf of Khambat. Marine geologists argued that the sonar images are inconclusive and would remain open to various and contradictory interpretations, unless verified by actual underwater excavations. Without such physical investigations, which ought to clearly document the presence of artifacts in intact, stratified archaeological deposits and in situ man-made structures, whatever interpretations may be made based on sonar imagery alone would remain unverifiable.

A follow up investigation was conducted by the same institute in November 2001, which included dredging to recover artifacts. News articles report that a block of wood was recovered that was dated to 9,500 years old, which is 5000 years older than the Indus Valley Civilisation. As noted by Witzel (2006), there is a complete lack of any stratigraphic evidence to show that this piece of wood is associated in any way with the geometric patterns seen in sonar images and the various objects recovered from the floor of the Gulf of Khambat (Cambay). In many major river or estuary systems, it is quite common to find pieces of wood, which are thousands of years old, which have been eroded from older sediments and incorporated into modern sediments [1].

A round of further underwater explorations was made in the Gulf of Khambat (Cambay) site by the NIOT team from 2003 to 2004, and the samples obtained of what was presumed to be pottery were sent to laboratories in Oxford, UK and Hanover, Germany, as well as several institutions within India, to be dated by optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and thermoluminescence dating techniques. These pieces returned dates ranging from 13000 ± 1950 BP up to the oldest at 31270 ± 2050 BP, leading to NIOT's chief geologist Badrinaryan Badrinaryan making the claim that they had uncovered the earliest-known pottery remains in the world, from about 31000 BP [2]. In his web publication of his findings, Badrinaryan (2006) stated:

Since some persons have expressed doubts about the pottery pieces, a thorough scientific study was made involving the pottery pieces to establish their authenticity. To determine the properties of various material including pottery, many samples were subjected to X-Ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Since the materials that constitute pottery etc are clays and heterogeneous mixures of a variety of materials, these were accordingly analysed. Every area has a special fingerprint pattern in the clay which can be recognized in X-Ray diffraction (XRD). The above analysis was carried out in Deccan College, Pune Maharashtra state, India,by using an advanced instrument which gave excellent results. The conclusions are that the pattern of pottery pieces corresponds very well with the locally available clay of Gulf of Khambat (Cambay). The mineral patterns of habitational floor, wattle and daub and land materials (alluvial deposit) are comparable. The patterns of fired clay, floor birck piece, vitrified clay, compare very well. All these indicate that they are genuine artifacts, made from locally available material and are insitu. It fully confirms the presence of archaeological sites. The findings indicate that the pottery was produced locally with levigated clay, fired uniformly at about 700°C. From the presence of calcite in clays and pottery arid to semi-arid environmental conditions prior to the submergence of the site could be deduced. Calcritised alluvial deposits indicate the existence of ancient rivers which once flowed in the submerged regions of Gulf of Khambat (Cambay).

However, the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of the items identified as "pottery", which had the older OSL dates, produced dates that are virtually identical to OSL dates obtained from associated sediments. That the "pottery" yielded OSL dates identical to associated sediments suggests that the "pottery", which produced the older and oldest OSL dates, were never fired and actually consist of pieces of naturally cemented sediments. This raises the possibility that the extremely old samples, as argued for many other "artifacts" recovered from the Gulf of Khambat (Cambay), are not man-made artifacts or potsherds, but rather concretions, nodules, and related objects of natural origin [3].

The XRD analysis fails to prove that these artifacts are man-made as natural concretions can also form in local alluvial sediments. The XRD data only indicates that the extremely old samples consists of sediments, which came from the alluvial deposits underlying the currently submerged and typically buried floodplain somewhere along the length of the Gulf of Khambat (Cambay). The "calcite" found in the extremely old "pottery" can be also interpreted to be the material cementing local alluvium together to form concretions, which have been misidentifed as pottery. Such concretions are noted to be quite common in naturally-occurring calcritised alluvial deposits.

[edit] References

Witzel, Micheal, 2006, Rama’s realm: Indocentric rewritings of early South Asian archaeology and history in Fagan, G. G., ed., Archaeological Fantasies. Routledge Taylor, and Francis Group, New York ISBN 0-415-30593-4
Badrinaryan 2006. "Gulf of Cambay Cradle of Ancient Civilization" 2006

[edit] External links

National Institute of Ocean Technology -- http://www.niot.res.in/m3/arch/index.htm
National Institute of Oceanography, Marine Archaeology Centre -- http://www.nio.org/projects/vora/project_vora.jsp -- descriptions of underwater findings from other locations.
Artifacts or Geofacts? Alternative Interpretations of Items from the Gulf of Cambay 2002 -- http://www.intersurf.com/~chalcedony/geofact.html
Gulf of Cambay Cradle of Ancient Civilization 2006 -- http://www.grahamhancock.com/forum/BadrinaryanB1.php?p=1
Submerged city in the Gulf of Khambat
Sunken City Off India Coast
BBC article: Lost city "could rewrite history" [4]
Submerged city in the Gulf of Khambat: neolithic precursor of the Sarasvati Sindhu Valley Civilization [5]