User talk:Sneewop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for experimenting with the page Giant Panda on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger22 02:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Canada
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\talk 13:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. |
--ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\talk 14:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Do Not Remove Warnings
Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Anger22 02:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Do Not Remove Warnings
Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Anger22 22:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- One more incidence of removing warnings from your talk page will result in a block. Your talk page comments are not yours to remove - but you may archive them together with other, linking the archive from the talk page. See, e.g., my talk page, which links several archives at the top. This is your last warning. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- You have been blocked for 24 hours for disruption. Now, the only thing you can edit while blocked is your talk page - and if you clear the warnings again, I will protect it against editing. When you come back from your 24 hour hiatus, I hope you will behave more productively. - CrazyRussian talk/email 22:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Go ahead, ban me from editing, deny me my 1st ammendment rights... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sneewop (talk • contribs) .
- The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states in relevant part, "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech ... ." Wikipedia, on the other hand, is run by a private foundation, which can certainly abridge or ban your speech if it wishes to do so. I am going to ask you one more time to stop being stubborn and edit productively or not at all. If you blank your talk page one more time or act out in any other fashion, I am going to protect your talk page, extend your block, and ask my fellow administrators if they think an indefinite ban in warranted. It's completely up to you. - CrazyRussian talk/email 07:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)