Talk:Tropical cyclone scales
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merge?
Unless this can be expanded it should just be merged into tropical cyclone, which probably has all the relevant information already anyway. — jdorje (talk) 17:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
I think it should be merged into the Tropical cyclone scales, since it is a main article from a category of tropical cyclone, which specifically discusses the storm scales such as super typhoon. The article Tropical cyclone only has a brief description of the scales and links to the main scales article. Mtmelendez 13:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I think we should merge the catgories into the Hurricane Page as well
[edit] New table
Tropical Cyclone Classifications | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beaufort scale | 10-minute sustained winds (knots) | N Indian Ocean IMD |
SW Indian Ocean MF |
Australia BOM |
SW Pacific FMS |
NW Pacific JMA |
NW Pacific JTWC |
NE Pacific & N Atlantic NHC & CPHC |
0-6 | <28 | Depression | Tropical Depression | Tropical Low | Tropical Depression | Tropical Depression | Tropical Depression | Tropical Depression |
7 | 28-29 | Deep Depression | ||||||
30-33 | Tropical Storm | Tropical Storm | ||||||
8-9 | 34-47 | Cyclonic Storm | Moderate Tropical Storm | Tropical Cyclone (1) | Tropical Cyclone | Tropical Storm | ||
10 | 48-55 | Severe Cyclonic Storm | Severe Tropical Storm | Tropical Cyclone (2) | Severe Tropical Storm | |||
11 | 56-63 | Typhoon | Hurricane (1) | |||||
12 | 64-72 | Very Severe Cyclonic Storm | Tropical Cyclone | Severe Tropical Cyclone (3) | Typhoon | |||
73-85 | Hurricane (2) | |||||||
86-89 | Severe Tropical Cyclone (4) | Hurricane (3) | ||||||
90-99 | Intense Tropical Cyclone | |||||||
100-106 | Hurricane (4) | |||||||
107-114 | Severe Tropical Cyclone (5) | |||||||
115-119 | Very Intense Tropical Cyclone | Super Typhoon | ||||||
120 | Super Cyclonic Storm | Hurricane (5) |
I've created this table to try and more neutrally represent things. I've added the SSHS coloration to the NHC table, which is why it is at the far right. The US 1-min speeds have been converted using a 14% reduction factor which seems standard; see the discussion on Talk:2003 Pacific typhoon season. It may be an idea to incorporate the Beaufort Scale into this table as well. What do people think?--Nilfanion (talk) 12:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- It looks good, and I think including the Beaufort Scale would also be a good idea. Also, since we use the SSHS colors for the Australian scale where it appears on Wikipedia, we could use them in this table as well. —Cuiviénen 01:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually we use the color for the SSHS category of Australian storms, see how Cyclone Larry does it. We could just color in the whole table with the SSHS colors (split typhoon up for instance) but that would lose the clarity and look hideous. I've added the Beaufort scale now too (without that articles colors it would overwhelm IMO).--Nilfanion (talk) 08:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- And we could split up the windspeed like Beaufort scale does it, so we have knots, km/h and mph all listed.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Here brings up an issue I had never even thought about until I found it: how do you measure gusts? Do you use 1-second, 3-seconds, or apply a factor to the sustained winds? Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- IIRC there isn't that much difference between a 1 and 3 second averaging time (can't remember where I saw that) and I there is no simple relation between gusts and sustained winds (hence the edit war on Cyclone Larry). As for the relation of the Aus scale to the SS scale the Dvorak table at the bottom here is probably the best sign that the above table is valid - DT is how most storms are measured, its only the Atlantic and landfalling storms which get better treatment. I wonder if we should remove the actual windspeeds from the above table completely, as it compares to the Beaufort and SS scales it gives all the info someone would need to compare the scales, without a complicated explanation of the 10-min thing.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Here brings up an issue I had never even thought about until I found it: how do you measure gusts? Do you use 1-second, 3-seconds, or apply a factor to the sustained winds? Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- And we could split up the windspeed like Beaufort scale does it, so we have knots, km/h and mph all listed.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually we use the color for the SSHS category of Australian storms, see how Cyclone Larry does it. We could just color in the whole table with the SSHS colors (split typhoon up for instance) but that would lose the clarity and look hideous. I've added the Beaufort scale now too (without that articles colors it would overwhelm IMO).--Nilfanion (talk) 08:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
What about PAGASA? Do they use a similar scale to JTWC, or to JMA, or do they have their own system? I remember that they called Bilis a typhoon when everyone else called it an TS/STS. Also, we should probably drop coloring for the SSHS if we're not using for anything else since IMO it draws too much attention to the US scale, making it seem somehow more important. I've also added specifications for where the NHC and JTWC cover. —Cuiviénen 02:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes the color does unbalance the table, the colors should be introduced on the section on the SSHS. I think, though I can't remember the source, that PAGASA uses 1-minute winds, probably due to the US influences in the country. Here's a PAGASA source on their scale. The only reason for mentioning the JTWC is that it was official in the NW Pacific, so older typhoon articles should use its data.
- I've also redone the headers so the regions mention the RSMC for the basin. That means there is a redlink. I'm not sure if I have got the initialisms completely correct.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SI FTW, imperialistic bastards!
Why in the world are the values on this page backwards? SI notation is the world standard, not American imperial.