Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Peer review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Military history WikiProject

General information Main project page [a] · talk Announcements and open tasks talk     Requests talk     New articles talk Article showcase Guidelines Naming conventions Notability Article structure Content and style Infobox templates     Military conflict infobox talk     Campaignboxes talk     Military person infobox talk     Military unit infobox talk     Weapon infobox talk     Military structure infobox talk     Military test site infobox talk     Military cemetery infobox talk     Military memorial infobox talk     Military award infobox talk Categories Featured article advice Project organization Coordinators talk Members talk Departments     Assessment talk     Automation talk     Collaboration talk     Outreach talk     Peer review talk Project banner talk Project category talk Meetup planning talk Task forces African military history talk American Civil War talk Ancient Near Eastern warfare talk Australian military history talk Balkan military history talk British military history talk Canadian military history talk Chinese military history talk Classical warfare talk Dutch military history talk Early Modern warfare talk French military history talk German military history talk Indian military history talk Italian military history talk Japanese military history talk Maritime warfare talk Medieval warfare talk Military aviation talk Military historiography talk Military memorials and cemeteries talk Military science talk Military technology and engineering talk Napoleonic Era talk Polish military history talk Russian and Soviet military history talk United States military history talk Weaponry talk World War I talk World War II talk edit · changes

[edit] where do i find the peer review details for 1971

hi, where can i find the peer review details for the indo-pakistani war of 1971, as i felt that it deserved better than that. anyways please put forward some suggestions for its elevation in ratings.

nids 06:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on user's talk page. Kirill Lokshin 12:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

yeah i got your reply. i am satisfied with the importance given to the article, but i really thought that the class could have been "A". if it is not, than immediate attention should be given to such highly important articles (as rated by you), so that they shall get atleast an A. I think WP shall work a bit harder so that all the "high" important articles get something like "A".

nids 08:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Broadly speaking, no article can get A-Class without being properly cited. That tends to be the main factor holding things back. This particular article also needs the list sections at the bottom cleaned up, and should be lengthened accordingly. Fundamentally, though, there are a lot of very important articles; unless people are interested in improving them, they're not going anywhere. Kirill Lokshin 11:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Military Brat

I tried adding military brat for peer review, but it is not showing up on this list... did I do something wrong?Balloonman 08:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Replied on user's talk page. Kirill Lokshin 14:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)