Discuţie Utilizator:Remigiu

De la Wikipedia, enciclopedia liberă

If it is not a problem, please, write your messages in English, and under it, write the Romanian equivalent in italics. Thank you / Mulţumesc. Mihai ^scrie-mi

---

--Vlad|-> 15 ianuarie 2006 03:06 (EET)

Cuprins 1 Pagina utilizator 2 â şi î 3 Your request 4 Invitation to the checkuser vote 5 Pages for dates 6 Wikipedia:Wikipedist 7 Powiat Słupsk 8 Interbellic Couny Images 9 Tori Amos 10 limba caşubiană 11 Garda de Fier 12 Stub sorting 13 Hradec Králové 14 Request for information 15 Re: Categorisation in Romani Wikipedia 16 Format:Şterge 17 Timis Maps 18 Multumesc! Thank you! 19 Stub sorting project 20 Category 21 Liv Kristine 22 Deletion of Silvia Night 23 Main page 24 Protection 25 Mini-sondaj pagina principală 26 Re: adjectiv 27 Wikiversity 28 Username 29 Zamenhof 30 Re: Rugăminte redenumire 31 Classification 32 Before you mark pages for deletion 32.1 Before you mark pages for deletion (2) 33 October 34 Vot pentru inlaturarea rusului Epure de pe MO:WIKI 35 Utilizator:Remigiu/Słupsk 36 Dezambiguizare

[modifică] Pagina utilizator

Hi Michal,

We are happy to have you here, and also happy to see you contributing. If you allow me, I want to tell you the correct version for your message on your user page. It is like so:

Numele meu este Michał şi eu înţeleg româna cu multă dificultate. În principal, eu ajut prin adăugare de Interwiki-uri.

which goes like this:

My name is Michał and I undrestant romanian with great difficulty. Mainly, I help by adding Interwikis.

Orioane 26 ianuarie 2006 19:15 (EET)

No problem, about the mistakes, I can assure you my polish is worse ;). Anyways keep up the good work. Orioane 26 ianuarie 2006 23:22 (EET)

[modifică] â şi î

Hi,

I've seen you asked what is the difference between â and î. As sounds, there is no difference and the only one is because orthography. I don't know exactly which was the rule before the war, but during the communist period the rule was that î is used everywhere except for the words român, and its derivates and România and also for the verb to be at the fisrst person singular and third person plural: sînt. After the Romanian revolution there was a mouvement to revert to the old orthography using â, and in 1993 the Romanian Academy modified the rule and the current one is: at the beginning of a word there is always î and inside a word only the first one is â, and the rest are î (for example fountain is fântînă). Also the verb to be at the fisrst person singular and third person plural is writen sunt. However, there is a certan discontent about this rule change and you can easily find books and cultural newspapers written with the old rules. Also the older persons (older than 30) don't tend to use the rule and in the Republic of Moldova, the old rule is still in effect. Orioane 27 ianuarie 2006 00:16 (EET)

[modifică] Your request

Hy,

About your requests from yesterday - that related to the Românime article and the one about the Romanian Road system.

About the first one, the Romanime article, i am sorry to say this, but I don't think I'll try and translate it on the english wikipedia, because I don't quite like the other users reaction there about tha articles of this type, and I'll refrain from starting an article on a delicate matter. I'm sorry to say this, but there are some fights going on there on the n:Transylvania, en:Moldavian language and en:Romanianization articles, and I don't want to get into the fight.

About the roads in Romania, I searched the maps I knew, but I couldn't find one. All I found was the complete list of motorways and national roads at trhis article: en:Roads and expressways in Romania. Orioane 28 ianuarie 2006 21:13 (EET)

[modifică] Invitation to the checkuser vote

You are now entitled to vote in the checkuser elections overhere at Romanian Wikipedia. We are glad to invite you to vote for your favorite users and is very important for us your opinion - we need the minimum number of votes so please vote.

In order to vote, press Votaţi aici for each candidate. If you agree with the user add yourself at Pentru, if not at Împotrivă or if you want not to vote for the candidate add yourself at Abţineri. If you want to leave comments to the vote add at Comentarii. Thank you very much, Mihai | D 31 ianuarie 2006 22:35 (EET)

Thank you, Michał P, for the supporting vote given to myself as a checkuser candidate. --Vlad|-> 1 februarie 2006 13:29 (EET)

[modifică] Pages for dates

Hello. I have recently started to attempt expanding the chapters for births and deaths in the date pages. Wanting so, I investigated the variants in English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and Swedish in order to obtain as much information as possible. I'd like your help in importing such births/deaths entries from the Polish Wikipedia as well. Do you think you have the spare time to assist me with some simple translations now and then? Thanks. --Rebel 19 februarie 2006 15:28 (EET)

Oh, I only requested an English translation. I'll then adapt them to Romanian. No need in complicating things. I'll let you know as soon as I'm ready. Thanks. --Rebel 19 februarie 2006 16:28 (EET)

[modifică] Wikipedia:Wikipedist

Hi. An anonymous user added you in the wikipedians' list as living in Słupsk, Poland. Was that you? Thanks. — AdiJapan ☎ 25 februarie 2006 02:36 (EET)

[modifică] Powiat Słupsk

Dear Michał, I saw that both the German and the Netherlands Wikipedia uses the name "Powiat Słupski" for the article about your district. "Judeţ" is a typical Romanian form of administration, thatswhy I think that the form "Judeţul Słupsk" is very peculiar. My proposal is to redirect the article to "Powiat Słupsk" or "Powiat Słupski". I am glad for your interest concerning the Romanian Wikipedia. --Mihai Andrei 3 martie 2006 22:35 (EET)

Surely! Kind regards, --Mihai Andrei 15 martie 2006 11:48 (EET)

[modifică] Interbellic Couny Images

Hello,

I've seen youve asked Andrei if you can use the interbellic county Romanian map. It is already on commons, and you can also find a full category of highligted maps of all the counties. It is commons:Category:Locator maps of historical counties in Romania. Orioane -^msg- 15 martie 2006 11:55 (EET)

[modifică] Tori Amos

Hi! I had to comment out the second paragraph (http://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tori_Amos&diff=299342&oldid=297842), because really I can't make any sense of it. Please don't mind my asking if is it some sort of automatic translation? Thanks! --Vlad|-> 16 martie 2006 20:38 (EET)

Ok, I see, sorry for this, I've put the English paragrpah commented, maybe I'll get a chance to get to it later. When you've got a couple of minutes, could you please take a look at Skarżysko-Kamienna and put some description to the two external links? Thanks! --Vlad|-> 17 martie 2006 17:12 (EET)

[modifică] limba caşubiană

Hello,

For me the most correct seems to be limba caşubiană. It might also be correct limba kaşubiană - with a k - but since the letter k is rarely used in Romanian I think the first one would be better. Orioane -^msg- 5 aprilie 2006 10:19 (EEST)

On google, I find most results for limba kaşubiană, though there are also some results for limba caşubiană. BTW, in the Format:Interwiki principală we only put Wikipedias bigger (with more articles) + Aromanian language (dialect of Romanian) and Rromani (a new Wikipedia launched with support from Romanian Wikipedia). If it was to be Wikipedia Romania, Moldova and Vojvodina we would also put Wikipedia in Hungarian and Wikipedia in German (German Wikipedia is anyway bigger than the Romanian one), Wikipedia in Russian (Russian Wikipedia is also bigger than the Romanian one), Wikipedia in Ukranian, and maybe also Wikipedia in Serbian. But this is Wikipedia in Romanian, not Wikipedia Romania. For instance http://www.wikimedia.ro is available in all languages spoken in Romania. But anyway there is a list with most Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Coordonare multilingvă, even though it is old, and it should be actualized. Otherwise I'm very glad to see a non-Romanian speaker trying to contribute in the Romanian Wikipedia. But I guess you do speak some Romanian, because as I saw your contributions they contain whole frases written in correct or almost correct Romanian. --Danutz

[modifică] Garda de Fier

Hi! Thank you for your notice! Yes, it smells fishy to me too, for there is too much text written at once. And I think that part of it is copy-pasted from somewhere (it may be not) Sadly, I do not know about the facts that really happened (or are accepted by the majority of the historians), for I am not good at all with history, especially if recent. I will make some research of my own, but until then I will send your message to other people who know better, so they can decide. Thanks again! --KlaudiuMihăilă ^Mesaj 18 aprilie 2006 00:24 (EEST)

[modifică] Stub sorting

Hi! I agree that we should sort the stubs, so I'll try to do as much as I can in the future. --Emily | ^msg. 25 aprilie 2006 23:10 (EEST)

[modifică] Hradec Králové

Hi Michał. Claudiu has made the corrections, but in en.wp the population is 95 195 and in ro.wp is 94 684. -Laurap\ ^mesaj 26 aprilie 2006 17:08 (EEST)

[modifică] Request for information

Hello Michał,

My name is Razvan and I am also working as much as I can on the Romanian Wikipedia. I am pleased to meet someone interested in Romanian culture. Sorry for bothering you but we need some information.

We have currently a very heated debate on the Romanian Church United with Rome (Greek Catholic). Against this background we have a debate on the situation of the greek-catholics in other countries of the Eastern Block. As far as I know this church was also suppressed in Poland. Could you tell us some information or indicate some on-line sources in English, French or German about the story of the Greek-Catholic Church in Poland?

Thank you very much and sorry for bothering you,

Razvan2001 8 mai 2006 00:22 (EEST)

[modifică] Re: Categorisation in Romani Wikipedia

Hi! There will come also the categories, by now there is a lot of work to do to make it workable (interface translation, templates). All the best, Desiphral 14 iunie 2006 22:27 (EEST)

[modifică] Format:Şterge

Hi. What was wrong at Format:Şterge? — AdiJapan ☎ 24 iunie 2006 21:02 (EEST)

Good job on Moldovan Wikipedia, this should be closed immediately. --Bonaparte talk 26 iunie 2006 12:41 (EEST)

Dear Michał,

potrzebuję żeby dziękować. Dziękują tak dalece! Sprawiać przyjemność, nie niepokoi my będzie wygrywać. Sorry for the mistakes, I hope you don't mind :) --Bonaparte talk 26 iunie 2006 16:17 (EEST)

[modifică] Timis Maps

Hi and thanks for reminding me about the utility of uploading the maps directly to Wikicommons. I was unsure whether I should do that right from the beginning but in the end decided to upload them on our ro wikipedia. They can later be used by whoever, even uploaded by bots to wikicommons(if there are any). For now I wanted to make a point, since they are, I beleive, some of the first maps of this kind to come up from our community. Maybe you can understand me. So...they're uploaded already:) But thanks!

[modifică] Multumesc! Thank you!

http://mo.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AFratele_lui_Bonaparte%2C_il_cunosti%3F&diff=11789&oldid=11787 Thank you! I'm blocked there but as well as Node is blocked and his friend Telex, but they create Socks like a gun machine, as the last one Bonny...They keep vandalising that artificial Wikipedia and their users. Bonaparte talk 29 iunie 2006 08:30 (EEST)

Maybe you could also remind Bogdan that a sock, namely Bonny is still not blocked. It's from the series of Telex's socks that impersonates any name of Bonaparte. Now sock of Telex are Bonny and No name for now..--Bonaparte talk 29 iunie 2006 14:23 (EEST)

[modifică] Stub sorting project

Hello! I saw that you joined the Stub Sorting Wikiproject. If you have questions related to this project, feel free to ask, I'd be glad to help. Also, if you wish, you can add this project's user box on your page: {{Utilizator WP:SC}}. --Horia S 29 iunie 2006 21:01 (EEST)

Well, there are simpler tasks such as assigning the right stub labels wherever you find an article which needs that. :) --Horia S 29 iunie 2006 22:25 (EEST)

[modifică] Category

You dubled the category. Categorie:Istoria Marii Britanii exists already as categorie:Istoria Regatului Unit. And I think, Categorie:Marea Britanie should redirect to Categorie:Regatul Unit. Mihai ^scrie-mi 6 iulie 2006 14:38 (EEST)

• Done ! Thank for for signalizing it ! Wars 6 iulie 2006 14:51 (EEST)
• Făcut ! Terminat ! (These two are past participles of the verbs "a face", respectivelly "a termina"). Gata ! (Adverb) Mulţumesc pentru sesizarea acesteia (acestei probleme). Wars 6 iulie 2006 14:57 (EEST)

[modifică] Liv Kristine

Ok. Done. --Rebel 16 iulie 2006 21:05 (EEST)

[modifică] Deletion of Silvia Night

Hello Michał. I noticed you added the article specified above for deletion. I removed the {{şterge}} format hoping that the person who created it will eventually return and develop it at least into a stub, if not more. That article is not the only one containing merely a table or a format. I'll just wait to see what our anonymus contributor will do in the future regarding the Eurovision-related articles and decide what to do with them then.

Hope you understand. Cheers. --Rebel 19 iulie 2006 05:02 (EEST)

On the English Wikipeida Silvia Night redirects to Silvía Night. I motived the original page to the previously mentioned title, which others found correct. Alright? Cheers. --Rebel 19 iulie 2006 14:57 (EEST)

Hi Michael, pls look at the Moldovan Wikipedia, it seems that Khoikhoi is the vandal Moldova. Dziekuje!!--Bonaparte talk 3 septembrie 2006 22:17 (EEST)

[modifică] Main page

Congratulations on your page being chosen as the best option. I am delighted with the level of commitment you are showing to the Romanian Wikipedia. --Rebel 17 septembrie 2006 00:22 (EEST)

[modifică] Protection

Hi. I don't see a good reason to protect templates {{UnireCutie}} and {{UnireCutieFin}}. We are trying to have as few protected pages as possible, and use this feature exclusively in those places where it is strictly necessary, that is, on very visible pages such as the main page or templates used in thousands of articles.

Besides, I think those two templates are almost useless, because they contain one short line each. Using templates for such cases only strains the servers. I suggest writing the boxmerge div command directly in the articles, unless you plan to extend those templates. Cheers. — AdiJapan ☎ 18 septembrie 2006 12:35 (EEST)

[modifică] Mini-sondaj pagina principală

In case you have difficulties understanding what I said there, here's the English translation: "I don't agree with Michał's argument. At the begining of the page there is a list of portals, and Portal:România is a portal; I don't think including a portal in a list of portals has any special significance (romanian-centrism in this case.)" Regards. Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 15:59 (EEST)

Yes, "am răspuns" means "I answered". :-) Portal:România may be just a regional portal on any other Wikipedia, but this being the Romanian Wikipedia, Portal:România automatically acquires a special status (I would suspect Portal:Polska has a special status on the Polish Wikipedia too). As far as the list goes, since it is selective, it will include by necesity those items that are deemed important by a majority of users (well, a majority of users who care to talk about it). Since the huge majority of users here are Romanians, it should be no surprise that Portal:România is deemed important, hence the inclusion of Portal:România in the selective list. I do not think that Romanians thinking that Romanian topics are important denotes "Romanian-centrism". Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 17:27 (EEST)

This argument is largly pointless, Michał, especially since I don't care about having Portal:România in any special place (or any place at all for that matter) on the main page. That discussion is about removing the Românofonie link from the list of links at the bottom of the page. As far as I'm concerned Românofonie should be removed, period, but there are users that feel it's better to either keep it around, or to replace it with Portal:România. Anyway, while I disagree with you that including a link to Portal:România means "românocentrism", I respect your opinion, so I suggest we agree to have this disagreement and to leave it where it is now.

No, you are not making a lot of mistakes, but you wouldn't pass for a native speaker. :-) The important thing is that you can make yourself understood in Romanian, and that's a big deal. Romanian is not an easy language to learn, and any non-native speaker that manages it at the level you do is to be admired. Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 23:00 (EEST)

(here's the translation, as close as possible to the English version)

Disputa asta e inutilă, Michał, în special datorită faptului că mie nu-mi pasă dacă Portal:România e în vreun loc special (sau dacă e de tot) pe pagina principală. Discuţia este despre ştergerea legăturii la Românofonie din lista de legături din partea de jos a paginii principale. Din punctul meu de vedere legătura la Românofonie ar trebui ştearsă şi cu asta basta, dar sunt alţi utilizatori care cred că ar fi mai bine să fie păstrată, sau să fie înlocuită cu o legătură la Portal:România. În orice caz, deşi nu sunt de acord cu părerea ta că o legătură la Portal:România înseamnă "românocentrism", îţi respect opinia, aşa că propun să fim de acord să avem această diferenţă de opinii şi să oprim discuţia asta aici.

Nu, nu faci multe greşeli, dar nici nu treci drept vorbitor nativ. :-) Ce este important e că poţi să spui ce ai de spus în româneşte, şi asta e lucru mare. Româna nu e o limbă uşor de învăţat, şi oricine nu e un vorbitor nativ care poate să vorbească la nivelul la care poţi tu e de admirat. Dmaftei 22 septembrie 2006 23:14 (EEST)

I thought I made it pretty clear that I'm done with this discussion... If you want to pursue it any further you should continue it at the discussion page with those users who have more interest in the topic. I really don't care how the issue will be resolved. Dmaftei 23 septembrie 2006 03:04 (EEST)

come and vote man! Hai la vot pe en:wiki--Bonaparte talk 24 septembrie 2006 16:20 (EEST)

[modifică] Re: adjectiv

Nu ştiu, dar "pomeraniană" sună cel mai bine. Ar trebui să mai întrebi şi pe alţii. Dmaftei 25 septembrie 2006 19:41 (EEST)

[modifică] Wikiversity

Hi Michal! What exactly is a wikiversity? Thanks! --Vlad|-> 29 septembrie 2006 15:47 (EEST)

Hi again! I'm sorry but I didn't get that (the explanation about what vikiversity is)... Would you mind doing that again in English? :) --Vlad|-> 2 octombrie 2006 12:45 (EEST)

[modifică] Username

As far as I know usernames cannot be changed. If you want to start using another username you can create another account. If you do that, please mention both on your new and old user pages the other account, so that everyone knows it's the same person. However, I don't see a big problem with your current username. Anyone can copy-paste it if they really need to, unless you mind people writing your name as Michal instead of Michał. — AdiJapan ☎ 2 octombrie 2006 06:10 (EEST)

[modifică] Zamenhof

You just moved the article L. L. Zamenhof to Ludwik Łazarz Zamenhof, and I moved it back to its original name. I think it is much better since:

• It is not clear which was Zamenhof's mother tongue, most probably he had several, so it won't be correct to write the name only in Polish, or in any other language for that matter.
• There are many variants of his name in different languages. So the best way to solve this is to write the initials only in the article, and give all name variants in the text.
• Zamenhof himself often signed L. L. Zamenhof, and this is used by the Esperanto wikipedia (see here).
• Most Romanians won't probably know how to pronounce Ludwik Łazarz, so I prefer a Romanian variant Ludovic Lazar.

Thanks, Dumiac 7 octombrie 2006 01:00 (EEST)

[modifică] Re: Rugăminte redenumire

Michał P. a fost redenumit în Remigiu. --Mihai | D 7 octombrie 2006 17:01 (EEST)

[modifică] Classification

I was only trying to classify stubs (romanian ciot). As such I only used the categories which were approved in the site Wikipedia:Sortarea cioturilor/Tipuri de cioturi. What you are referring to are the categories. I don't know if besides being noted as stubs, these should also be categorized. I assumed that this will be done when somebody writes an article on the stub.

I agree with you that categories make searching much easier. But I hardly expect anybody to look for stubs, just to find out that a poet is a poet.

Of course if the rules are different, I will revise my views.

Afil 18 octombrie 2006 01:07 (EEST)

I am not sure I understand your objections. Just be so kind and give me the title of an article where you have completed the characterization, and another title of one which I have written and has not been done, so that I can see the difference.

Unfortunately, I did not locate any of those where you made changes.

Afil 18 octombrie 2006 23:54 (EEST)

Now I finally understand what you want to do, but I respectfully disagree.

There are two alternatives, out of which I adopted the first.

1. If we are talking about a stub (ciot in romanian) a total list of categories is tedious, and may even not be possible, as many information leading to the choice of categories is missing. In this case, the stub should be caracterized only as stub, with the minimum charistics required for stubs, such as in the cases of our examples ciot-bio-Russia. This is what I considered enough.

2. To get all the possible categories for the stub article. This means, that not only all the categories should be included but also that the name be included in all relevant lists. This is what I have made experimentally for the articles Georgi Adamovici and Roman Gul which you may want to consult.

What you are suggesting, of just including one category seems to me superficial. Why only one category if there are more which could be needed. For instance, in your own example, of Mihail Lermontov, you could have used the years of birth and death which are indicated in the stub. And you could also have listed Lermontov in various lists of russian writers and poets, as well as on the day of birth and death. That would make it complete.

I would however indicate that this is extremely tedious. I considered that when I write an article, all references should at least lead to a stub. A completed article should not have any red references left. This is possible if you accept that the stubs have only the stub category, and leave the details till the entire article is written.

You will be able to notice that in the Romanian Wikipedia there are many references which remain in red, i.e. do not even have stubs. This is valid even for articles which have been accepted as quality articles. And it is disturbing.

Anyway, maybe this issue is worth discussing at the coffee shop in order to reach a common conclusion. In the meantime, I will try to categorize the stubs I am preparing, however I cannot promise to have them complete. The wikipedia system of categories is quite complex. In the romanian system however, there are many categories missing, and the exercise does not only require selecting the categories, but also selecting the new categories which have to be included as well as their subordination. I am not sure that I can do all this, especially for domains with which I am not very comfortable.

But let's keep on discussing the issue. And I would like to know your views about a more general discussion at the coffee shop.

Afil 20 octombrie 2006 03:55 (EEST)

[modifică] Before you mark pages for deletion

Before you mark pages for deletion, please do check if someone else create them right in the that moment... I am talking here about the Silverstone page. I am not happy with this!!!--S2K 19 octombrie 2006 17:48 (EEST)

[modifică] Before you mark pages for deletion (2)

Let's talk in English. Firstly, I clicked the save button to save the work I did, secondly I only started to create that page four minutes before you marked it for deletion. You may be an administrator here, but please do not use your function to make an abuse!!!

At least give the people one hour, and then mark the page... If you go to the page history you will see that exactly in the moment when you marked the page I was still working to give it a shape. Please do click on history before you mark the pages. --S2K 19 octombrie 2006 21:15 (EEST)

[modifică] October

OK.

Afil 21 octombrie 2006 20:46 (EEST)

[modifică] Vot pentru inlaturarea rusului Epure de pe MO:WIKI

http://mo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Candida%C5%A3i_pentru_promovare --Bonaparte talk 13 noiembrie 2006 23:20 (EET)

[modifică] Utilizator:Remigiu/Słupsk

Salut,

Done!!! I haven't undrestood what you wanted to say by aici se află ministerul maritim, centrala locală de poliţie şi partea spitalului voievodateane. - If you write it in English I'll try translating it. Also Heinrich von Stephan – director al Postului Germane it is not OK. what do you wanted to say by Postului - the post like the mail thing or the post as the control thing or the post as a radio. Orioane -^msg- 15 noiembrie 2006 16:12 (EET)

Done! Orioane -^msg- 15 noiembrie 2006 18:43 (EET)

If it doesn't upset you, I have spelchecked also your user page. :D Orioane -^msg-

[modifică] Dezambiguizare

Dear friend, I hope I understood and anyway I will follow these instructions. If I run into trouble I will ask you.

Prietene, sper că am înţeles şi oricum voi urma aceste instrucţiuni. Dacă mă încurc te voi întreba

Afil 20 noiembrie 2006 18:17 (EET)